Human Reproduction Update, Vol.10, No.3 pp.221-226, 2004
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved
A cytogeneticists perspective on genomic microarrays
Health Research and Education Center, Washington State University Spokane, Sacred Heart Medical Center, and Signature Genomic Laboratories, Spokane, Washington, USA 1 To whom the correspondence should be addressed at: Health Research and Education Center, Washington State University Spokane, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210. e-mail: lshaffer{at}wsu.edu
The identification of cytogenetic imbalance is an important component of clinical genetics. About 1 in 154 newborns has a chromosome abnormality. Conventional cytogenetic analysis has enabled the identification of microscopic alterations of the chromosomes. The development of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and other molecular methodologies has made possible the identification of submicroscopic aberrations. An additional development was comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), a method that directly compares two genomes for DNA copy differences. As first developed, the substrate for CGH analysis is normal metaphase chromosomes. Recently, CGH has been applied to microarrays (array CGH) constructed from large insert clones to identify chromosome imbalance. Array CGH has many advantages over conventional cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Array CGH can be comprehensive (genome-wide), high resolution, amenable to automation, rapid, and sensitive. We anticipate that array CGH will be employed in the clinical cytogenetics laboratory in the near future and will lead to the identification of the chromosomal basis of new syndromes and existing genetic conditions.
Key words: comparative genomic hybridization/fluorescence in situ hybridization/genetic diagnostics/microarray
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J.A. Kooper, B. H.W. Faas, T. Feuth, J. W.T. Creemers, H. H. Zondervan, P. F. Boekkooi, R. W.P. Quartero, R. J.P. Rijnders, I. van der Burgt, A. G. van Kessel, et al. Detection of Chromosome Aneuploidies in Chorionic Villus Samples by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2009; 11(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Nymark, H. Wikman, S. Ruosaari, J. Hollmen, E. Vanhala, A. Karjalainen, S. Anttila, and S. Knuutila Identification of Specific Gene Copy Number Changes in Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5737 - 5743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Rickman, H Fiegler, C Shaw-Smith, R Nash, V Cirigliano, G Voglino, B L Ng, C Scott, J Whittaker, M Adinolfi, et al. Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2006; 43(4): 353 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



