Skip Navigation


Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on April 5, 2008
Human Reproduction Update 2008 14(3):209-218; doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/3/209    most recent
dmn007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vercammen, M.J.
Right arrow Articles by Haentjens, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vercammen, M.J.
Right arrow Articles by Haentjens, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Accuracy of soluble human leukocyte antigen-G for predicting pregnancy among women undergoing infertility treatment: meta-analysis

M.J. Vercammen1, A. Verloes1, H. Van de Velde2 and P. Haentjens3,4,5

1 Laboratory of Haematology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium 2 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Belgium 3 Centre for Outcomes Research, UZ Brussel, Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium 4 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Belgian Branch of the Cochrane Collaboration (CEBAM), Belgium

5 Correspondence address. Tel: +32-2-477-64-18; Fax: +32-2-477-64-28; E-mail: patrick.haentjens{at}uzbrussel.be

BACKGROUND: There have been concerns about validity and accuracy of the measurement of sHLA-G in embryo culture supernatants. In this systematic review, we quantified the diagnostic accuracy of sHLA-G for predicting the ability to achieve clinical pregnancy in women who are undergoing infertility treatment.

METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched up to 7 September 2007, for full English and non-English articles concerning cohort studies evaluating sHLA-G in embryo culture for predicting clinical pregnancy in women undergoing IVF and ICSI.

RESULTS: Eleven studies including 1813 patients met our inclusion criteria. In the individual studies, sensitivity ranged from 0.01 to 0.97, specificity from 0.18 to 0.98, the positive likelihood ratio from 0.34 to 3.21 and the negative likelihood ratio from 0.08 to 1.01. These values were highly heterogeneous with, in each case, I2 values of >75%, and P-values for the Q statistic of <0.001, arguing against generating a pooled estimate for these diagnostic test properties. The diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) ranged from 0.92 to 24.82 in the individual studies with an I2 value of 49% indicating moderate heterogeneity. Therefore, the meta-analysis combined the logs of the DORs, which are derived from sensitivity and specificity. A random-effects model yielded a summary DOR of 4.38 (95% CI, 2.93–6.55), consistent with modest diagnostic accuracy. Interestingly, an a priori defined subgroup analysis restricted to six studies with good quality embryos showed a better diagnostic performance with a DOR of 12.67 (95% CI, 3.66–43.80) to predict the ability to achieve clinical pregnancy in women undergoing infertility treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed with single-embryo culture, single-embryo transfer and highly sensitive detection techniques to determine the potential application of measuring sHLA-G in culture supernatant.

Key words: soluble human leukocyte antigen-G / clinical pregnancy / meta-analysis / diagnostic accuracy / infertility treatment

Received on October 31, 2007; revised January 9, 2008; accepted on February 6, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.