Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J
Right arrow Articles by Lehtinen, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paavonen, J
Right arrow Articles by Lehtinen, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.2, No.6 pp.519-529, 1996
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1996; all rights reserved

Chlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease

J Paavonenz and M Lehtinen0

0 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland z Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00290 Helsinki, Finland. Email: jpaavone@c.Helsinki.Fi

Abstract

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is the most important complication present in the female lower genital tract, causing major medical, social and economic problems. Although PID can be caused by multiple micro-organisms, it results most frequently from the ascent of sexually transmitted Chlamydia.trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections from the cervix to the upper genital tract. The importance of cervical chlamydial infection in the pathogenesis of PID is well recognized. Recent data from many developed countries have shown a striking decrease in the incidence of gonococcal infections, while the rates of chlamydial infections remain high in most countries. Complications of PID are common and usually irreversible. Emerging evidence suggests that universal or selected screening of defined populations for cervical chlamydial infection leads to a dramatic reduction in the incidence of PID. Recent technological advances should further enhance efforts to prevent chlamydial infection and PID. Gene amplification-based diagnostic tests, screening by testing first-void urine, and single dose antimicrobial therapy greatly facilitate chlamydia control programmes. Thus, screening for chlamydia is the key approach in the secondary prevention of PID. The obvious challenge is to make screening for chlamydia the standard for health care for young, sexually active individuals. Since PID is the most important consequence of sexually transmitted bacterial infections, it is also imperative to develop better treatments to prevent the long-term sequelae of this disease. The development and implementation of new and effective intervention programmes for prevention and control of PID is one of the major challenges for the year 2000 and beyond.

Keywords: C.trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae/pelvic inflammatory disease


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
F. Petrovay, E. Balla, I. Nemeth, and E. Gonczol
Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from the endocervical specimens of high-risk women in Hungary
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2009; 58(6): 760 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. Mahilum-Tapay, V. Laitila, J. J Wawrzyniak, H. H Lee, S. Alexander, C. Ison, A. Swain, P. Barber, I. Ushiro-Lumb, and B. T Goh
New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test bridging the gap between diagnosis and treatment: performance evaluation study
BMJ, December 8, 2007; 335(7631): 1190 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
F. Saison, L. Mahilum-Tapay, C.-E. E. Michel, N. D. Buttress, E. C. B. Nadala Jr., J. P. V. Magbanua, E. M. Harding-Esch, M. O. Villaruel, L. Canong, R. L. Celis, et al.
Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection among Low- and High-Risk Filipino Women and Performance of Chlamydia Rapid Tests in Resource-Limited Settings
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2007; 45(12): 4011 - 4017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Sziller, O. Babula, A. Ujhazy, B. Nagy, P. Hupuczi, Z. Papp, I.M. Linhares, W.J. Ledger, and S.S. Witkin
Chlamydia trachomatis infection, Fallopian tube damage and a mannose-binding lectin codon 54 gene polymorphism
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1861 - 1865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. Anttila, L. Tenkanen, S. Lumme, M. Leinonen, R. E. Gislefoss, G. Hallmans, S. Thoresen, T. Hakulinen, T. Luostarinen, P. Stattin, et al.
Chlamydial Antibodies and Risk of Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 385 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
D. P. Novak, L. Lindholm, M. Jonsson, and R. B. Karlsson
A Swedish cost-effectiveness analysis of community-based Chlamydia trachomatis PCR testing of postal urine specimens obtained at home
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(5): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
E Honey, C Augood, A Templeton, I Russell, J Paavonen, P-A Mardh, A Stary, and B Stray-Pedersen
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
Sex Transm Inf, December 1, 2002; 78(6): 406 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.H. Kinnunen, H-M. Surcel, M. Lehtinen, J. Karhukorpi, A. Tiitinen, M. Halttunen, A. Bloigu, R.P. Morrison, R. Karttunen, and J. Paavonen
HLA DQ alleles and interleukin-10 polymorphism associated with Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal factor infertility: a case-control study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2073 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
H. K. Maxion and K. A. Kelly
Chemokine Expression Patterns Differ within Anatomically Distinct Regions of the Genital Tract during Chlamydia trachomatis Infection
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2002; 70(3): 1538 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Pimenta, M. Catchpole, M. Gray, J. Hopwood, and S. Randall
Evidence based health policy report: Screening for genital chlamydial infection
BMJ, September 9, 2000; 321(7261): 629 - 631.
[Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Kinnunen, P. Molander, A. Laurila, I. Rantala, R. Morrison, M. Lehtinen, R. Karttunen, A. Tiitinen, J. Paavonen, and H.-M. Surcel
Chlamydia trachomatis reactive T lymphocytes from upper genital tract tissue specimens
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1484 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
D. LaVerda, L. N. Albanese, P. E. Ruther, S. G. Morrison, R. P. Morrison, K. A. Ault, and G. I. Byrne
Seroreactivity to Chlamydia trachomatis Hsp10 Correlates with Severity of Human Genital Tract Disease
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2000; 68(1): 303 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.