Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (76)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egozcue, J
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egozcue, J
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, F
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.3, No.5 pp.441-452, 1997
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1997; all rights reserved

Chromosome studies in human sperm nuclei using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)

J Egozcuez, J Blanco and F Vidal

Unitat de Biologia Cellular, Facultat de Ciencies, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Valles), Spain z Corresponding author

Abstract

The use of chromosome specific DNA probes labelled with fluorochromes and especially the combination of several probes has been used to indirectly study the chromosome constitution in condensed sperm nuclei by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and has allowed to include this test in the protocol of study of infertile males. Still, if the test is to be valid, several strict conditions must be met, and some specific characteristics have to be taken into account. This becomes evident when comparing earlier results with more recent ones. The basic technical factors to be taken into account are the methods of chromatin decondensation, the number of spermatozoa and of individuals to study, the use of internal controls, the scoring criteria, the specificity of the probes and the possible existence of polymorphisms that may interfere with the detection of flourescent signals. In the last 7 or 8 years, a large number of papers has been published, describing the incidence of aneuploidies in controls, in individuals in whom a tendency to non-disjunction was suspected and in infertile males. Studies in controls have shown a considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in the frequency of aneuploidies, the tendency of some chromosomes to undergo non-disjunction (chromosome 21 and the sex chromosomes) and the importance of {alpha}-satellite polymorphisms when using centromere probes. In the control population, the frequency of aneuploidy per haploid set has been estimated at 6%. The incidence of aneuploidies in sperm nuclei for some of the chromosomes more frequently involved in trisomies is considerably higher than the incidence of these trisomies established through epidemiological data using the global incidence of chromosome abnormalities during the peri-implantation stage. In infertile males and in males with sex-chromosome abnormalities (usually with very low numbers of spermatozoa) the results show an increased incidence of sex chromosome aneuploidies and diploid (multi-aneuploid?) sperm nuclei. The results could be related to the higher incidence of chromosome abnormalities (especially sex-chromosome aneuploidies) observed in children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Key words: chromosome anomalies/fluorescence in-situ hybridization/human spermatozoa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sanchez-Castro, A.R. Jimenez-Macedo, M. Sandalinas, and J. Blanco
Prognostic value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis over PGD
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1516 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R.H. Martin
Cytogenetic determinants of male fertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, June 4, 2008; (2008) dmn017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. Froenicke, P.-H. Hung, C. A. VandeVoort, and L. A. Lyons
Development of a non-human primate sperm aneuploidy assay tested in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 13(7): 455 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Strassburger, M. Reichart, S. Kaufman, E. Kasterstein, D. Komarovsky, O. Bern, S. Friedler, M. Schachter, R. Ron-El, and A. Raziel
Morphology assessment and fluorescence in situ hybridization of the same spermatozoon using a computerized cell-scanning system
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, G. Cavallini, A. Crippa, M. Nadalini, L. Bernardini, G. F. Menchini Fabris, S. Voliani, and A. P. Ferraretti
Frequency of aneuploidy in sperm from patients with extremely severe male factor infertility
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2140 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
L. Gianaroli, M. C. Magli, and A. P. Ferraretti
Sperm and Blastomere Aneuploidy Detection in Reproductive Genetics and Medicine
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. Pellestor, T. Anahory, and S. Hamamah
The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 15 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Oliver-Bonet, J. Navarro, M. Codina-Pascual, C. Abad, M. Guitart, J. Egozcue, and J. Benet
From spermatocytes to sperm: meiotic behaviour of human male reciprocal translocations
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2515 - 2522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Rodrigo, C. Rubio, E. Mateu, C. Simon, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and M. Gil-Salom
Analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in testicular and epididymal spermatozoa from azoospermic ICSI patients by fluorescence in-situ hybridization
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 118 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. S. Barton, A. J. Wyrobek, F. S. Hill, B. Robaire, and B. F. Hales
Numerical Chromosomal Abnormalities in Rat Epididymal Spermatozoa Following Chronic Cyclophosphamide Exposure
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1150 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Jakab, T. Kovacs, Z. Zavaczki, A. Borsos, P. Bray-Ward, D. Ward, and G. Huszar
Efficacy of the swim-up method in eliminating sperm with diminished maturity and aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1481 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Ludwig, A. Katalinic, and for the German ICSI Follow-Up Study Group
Pregnancy course and health of children born after ICSI depending on parameters of male factor infertility
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Oliver-Bonet, J. Navarro, M. Carrera, J. Egozcue, and J. Benet
Aneuploid and unbalanced sperm in two translocation carriers: evaluation of the genetic risk
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 958 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Venkataraman and I. Craft
Triple-Y syndrome following ICSI treatment in a couple with normal chromosomes: Case report
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2560 - 2563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Pellestor, B. Andreo, F. Arnal, C. Humeau, and J. Demaille
Mechanisms of non-disjunction in human female meiosis: the co-existence of two modes of malsegregation evidenced by the karyotyping of 1397 in-vitro unfertilized oocytes
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2134 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Devillard, C. Metzler-Guillemain, R. Pelletier, C. DeRobertis, U. Bergues, S. Hennebicq, M. Guichaoua, B. Sele, and S. Rousseaux
Polyploidy in large-headed sperm: FISH study of three cases
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1292 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Eskenazi, A.J. Wyrobek, S.A. Kidd, X. Lowe, D. Moore II, K. Weisiger, and M. Aylstock
Sperm aneuploidy in fathers of children with paternally and maternally inherited Klinefelter syndrome
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 576 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Egozcue, J. Blanco, F. Vidal, and J. Egozcue
Diploid sperm and the origin of triploidy
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2002; 17(1): 5 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, M. Gil-Salom, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, Y. Minguez, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2084 - 2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Mas, M. Daudin, M.-C. Vincent, G. Bourrouillou, P. Calvas, R. Mieusset, and L. Bujan
Increased aneuploidy in spermatozoa from testicular tumour patients after chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1204 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
T.E. Schmid, X. Lowe, F. Marchetti, J. Bishop, J. Haseman, and A.J. Wyrobek
Evaluation of inter-scorer and inter-laboratory reliability of the mouse epididymal sperm aneuploidy (m-ESA) assay
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2001; 16(3): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Ushijima1, Y. Kumasako, P. E. Kihaile, K. Hirotsuru, and T. Utsunomiya
Analysis of chromosomal abnormalities in human spermatozoa using multi-colour fluorescence in-situ hybridization
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1107 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. O. Goodwin, D. S. Karabinus, R. G. Pergolizzi, and S. Benoff
L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel {alpha}-1C subunit mRNA is present in ejaculated human spermatozoa
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 6(2): 127 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Vegetti, E. Van Assche, A. Frias, G. Verheyen, M. M. Bianchi, M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Correlation between semen parameters and sperm aneuploidy rates investigated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in infertile men
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2000; 15(2): 351 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Vidal, J. Blanco, E.F. Fugger, K. Keyvanfar, M. Norton, J.D. Schulman, and J. Egozcue
Preliminary study of the incidence of disomy in sperm fractions after MicroSort flow cytometry
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 2987 - 2990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. Martinez-Pasarell, C. Templado, E. Vicens-Calvet, J. Egozcue, and C. Nogues
Paternal sex chromosome aneuploidy as a possible origin of Turner syndrome in monozygotic twins: Case report
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2735 - 2738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. M. de Kretser and H. W. G. Baker
Infertility in Men: Recent Advances and Continuing Controversies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3443 - 3450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Mroz, T. J. Hassold, and P. A. Hunt
Meiotic aneuploidy in the XXY mouse: evidence that a compromised testicular environment increases the incidence of meiotic errors
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1151 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.G. Pang, S.F. Hoegerman, A.J. Cuticchia, S.Y. Moon, G.F. Doncel, A.A. Acosta, and W.G. Kearns
Detection of aneuploidy for chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 21, X and Y by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in spermatozoa from nine patients with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1266 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.