Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Spears, N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.5, No.2 pp.153-165, 1999
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1999; all rights reserved

The role of intra-ovarian interactions in the regulation of follicle dominance

SJ Baker and N Spears0

Department of Biomedical Sciences (Physiology), Edinburgh University Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK 0 Corresponding author e-mail: Norah.Spears@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

The processes that precisely control the selection of ovulatory follicles from a growing cohort are poorly understood. This reduction in follicle number occurs through several phases of selection, consequently we limit the use of the term 'selection' to the first major reduction of growing follicles, at the pre- to early antral stage. The final process of selection, achieving the appropriate ovulatory number, is referred to as 'dominance'. We discuss possible mechanisms that could bring about these reductions and highlight intra-ovarian involvement, particularly via follicle-follicle interactions. Analogies are drawn between local ovarian events and processes commonly reported in the determination of cell fate in developmental biology. Two facets of intra-follicular interactions are proposed: initially that follicle-follicle interactions mediate early selection processes at the preantral stage, and later that during antral development dominant follicles directly affect the fate of the subordinate cohort members.

Keywords: cell fate/follicular dominance/follicle-follicle interactions/follicle selection/ovary


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Hoekstra, Z. Z. Zhao, C. B. Lambalk, G. Willemsen, N. G. Martin, D. I. Boomsma, and G. W. Montgomery
Dizygotic twinning
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 37 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. B. Baart, E. Martini, M. J. Eijkemans, D. Van Opstal, N. G.M. Beckers, A. Verhoeff, N. S. Macklon, and B. C.J.M. Fauser
Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 980 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Vitale, O. M. Gonzalez, F. Parborell, G. Irusta, S. Campo, and M. Tesone
Inhibin A Increases Apoptosis in Early Ovarian Antral Follicles of Diethylstilbestrol-Treated Rats
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1989 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Fukuda, K. Fukuda, C. Y. Andersen, and A. G. Byskov
Characteristics of human ovulation in natural cycles correlated with age and achievement of pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2501 - 2507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Fukuda, K. Fukuda, C. Y. Andersen, and A. G. Byskov
Right-sided ovulation favours pregnancy more than left-sided ovulation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1921 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.