Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Homburg, R
Right arrow Articles by Howles, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Homburg, R
Right arrow Articles by Howles, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.5, No.5 pp.493-499, 1999
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1999; all rights reserved

Low-dose FSH therapy for anovulatory infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: rational, results, reflections refinements

R Homburg0,1 and CM Howles2

0 Fertility Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Sourasky Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel 2 Ares-Serono, Geneva, Switzerland 1 Corresponding author address: 8 Kashani Street, Tel Aviv 69499, Israel

Abstract

Low-dose follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) regimens for induction of ovulation for women with polycystic ovaries have succeeded in reducing the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) almost to nil and the rate of multiple pregnancies to a minimum of 6%. This has been achieved by reaching, but not exceeding, the threshold level of FSH, starting with a daily dose of 75 IU for 14 days, using small incremental dose rises where necessary, and inducing uniovulation in 70% of cycles. Conception rates are as good, if not better, than those achieved with conventional therapy. The miscarriage rate is still relatively high (20-25%) and obese women fare worse. Serum oestradiol concentrations and the number of large and intermediate follicles on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration are much lower, in parallel with lower serum FSH concentrations. Inhibin values increase with the rise in serum FSH concentrations but those of luteinizing hormone decrease steadily throughout the follicular phase. New data using recombinant hFSH (rhFSH), rather than urinary gonadotrophin as the ovarian stimulant, demonstrate that treatment time is shortened. However, the ideal regimen has still to be formulated.

Key words: follicle-stimulating hormone/low-dose regime/ovulation induction/polycystic ovary syndrome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Nyboe Andersen, A. Balen, P. Platteau, P. Devroey, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the Bravelle Ovulation Induction (BOI) Study G
Predicting the FSH threshold dose in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. Franks, J. Stark, and K. Hardy
Follicle dynamics and anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 22, 2008; (2008) dmn015v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consens
Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 462 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Balen, P. Platteau, A. N. Andersen, P. Devroey, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the Bravelle Ovulation Induction (BOI) Study G
Highly purified FSH is as efficacious as recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1816 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Cedrin-Durnerin, N. Massin, J. Galey-Fontaine, H. Bry-Gauillard, M. Roger, N. Lahlou, and J.N. Hugues
Timing of FSH administration for ovarian stimulation in normo-ovulatory women: comparison of an early or a mid follicular phase initiation of a short-term treatment
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2941 - 2947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.N. Hugues, I. Cedrin-Durnerin, C.M. Howles, and On Behalf of the Recombinant FSH OI Study Group
The use of a decremental dose regimen in patients treated with a chronic low-dose step-up protocol for WHO Group II anovulation: a prospective randomized multicentre study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2817 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Platteau, A. N. Andersen, A. Balen, P. Devroey, P. Sorensen, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the Menopur Ovulation Induction (MOI) Study Gr
Similar ovulation rates, but different follicular development with highly purified menotrophin compared with recombinant FSH in WHO Group II anovulatory infertility: a randomized controlled study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1798 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovulation induction: a mini review
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2688 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Homburg
Clomiphene citrate--end of an era? a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2043 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.N. Hugues, J. Soussis, I. Calderon, J. Balasch, R.A. Anderson, A. Romeu, and on behalf of the Recombinant LH Study Group
Does the addition of recombinant LH in WHO group II anovulatory women over-responding to FSH treatment reduce the number of developing follicles? A dose-finding study
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 629 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Bayram, M. van Wely, E. M Kaaijk, P. M M Bossuyt, and F. van der Veen
Using an electrocautery strategy or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone to induce ovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, January 24, 2004; 328(7433): 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Christin-Maitre, J.N. Hugues, and on behalf of the Recombinant FSH Study Group
A comparative randomized multicentric study comparing the step-up versus step-down protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1626 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, and F. van der Veen
Recombinant FSH in alternative doses or versus urinary gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1143 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Loumaye, P. Engrand, Z. Shoham, S. G. Hillier, D. T. Baird, and on behalf of the Recombinant LH Study Group
Clinical evidence for an LH 'ceiling' effect induced by administration of recombinant human LH during the late follicular phase of stimulated cycles in World Health Organization type I and type II anovulation
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 314 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Gokyar, A. Kokcu, F. Yanik, M. B. Cetinkaya, T. Alper, and E. Malatyalioglu
Basal and day 12 inhibin concentrations in the prediction of ovarian response to gonadotrophins in women with PCOS
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2079 - 2083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch, F. Fabregues, M. Creus, B. Puerto, J. Penarrubia, and J. A. Vanrell
Follicular development and hormone concentrations following recombinant FSH administration for anovulation associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome: prospective, randomized comparison between low-dose step-up and modified step-down regimens
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 652 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.