Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speroff, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Speroff, L
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.5, No.6 pp.654-663, 1999
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1999; all rights reserved

Clinical implications. A clinician's response to the oral contraceptive thrombosis controversy

L Speroff

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA

Abstract

The controversy involving new progestin oral contraceptives (OC) began in late 1995, continued through 1996, and started to reach resolution in 1997. The fundamental question is whether OC containing desogestrel and gestodene have a different risk of thrombosis compared with OC containing older progestins. Correcting for preferential prescribing and the healthy user effect leads to the conclusion that all low-dose OC-regardless of progestin type-have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Low-dose OC do not increase the risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in healthy, non-smoking women less than 35 years of age. With effective patient screening for risk factors, the serious side effects of OC can be virtually eliminated.

Key words: clinical practice/oral contraceptives/progestins/thrombosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.