Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.5, No.6 pp.721-735, 1999
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1999; all rights reserved

Interpretations. Cardiovascular disease and combined oral contraceptives: reviewing the evidence and balancing the risks

TMM Farley0,z, O Meirik0 and J Collins1

0 UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada z Corresponding author

Abstract

Cardiovascular risks have been a concern since combined oral contraceptives (OCs) were first introduced. In the past four years new, mostly reassuring information on the safety of modern, low oestrogen dose OCs has become available. However, in 1995 the new information showed higher venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk for OCs containing desogestrel and gestodene compared with levonorgestrel-or norethindrone-containing OCs. The controversial responses by national authorities, their scientific and public health merits were hotly debated and many considered the differences in risk small and resulted from bias and/or confounding. We discuss these arguments and conclude they lack empirical support or cannot account for the 2-fold increased risk. The risk of ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) associated with low oestrogen dose OCs are very small in women without cardiovascular risk factors, while increased risk of haemorrhagic stroke is confined to women >35 years of age. Applying the most recent risks to models of OC-attributable events and deaths, OC-attributable mortality in women <35 years is estimated to be <3 per million users annually, rising to about 10 per million users annually among smokers. In the context of external cause mortality (about 90 per million women of reproductive age annually in the UK) such risks appear small. Over the age of 35 years, OC-attributable mortality is a more important concern, particularly among smokers. In the absence of any appreciable OC-attributable mortality in young healthy women, the additional VTE risk for third compared with second generation OCs should be considered when women choose which OC to use.

Key words: myocardial infarction/oral contraceptives/stroke/vascular risks/venous thromboembolism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Sitruk-Ware
New progestagens for contraceptive use
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 169 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. P. V. Gomes and S. R. Deitcher
Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Disease Associated With Hormonal Contraceptives and Hormone Replacement Therapy: A Clinical Review
Arch Intern Med, October 11, 2004; 164(18): 1965 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Alexandersen, J. Haarbo, P. Zandberg, J. Jespersen, S. O. Skouby, and C. Christiansen
Lack of difference among progestins on the anti-atherogenic effect of ethinyl estradiol: a rabbit study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1395 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
A. Girolami, L. Spiezia, F. Vianello, B. Girolami, and F. Fabris
Changes in Prescription Patterns of Oral Contraceptives in a Northern Italian Province: Relation With Venous Thromboembolism
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 125 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. C G Skegg
Oral contraceptives, venous thromboembolism, and the courts
BMJ, September 7, 2002; 325(7363): 504 - 505.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
A. Girolami, L. Spiezia, B. Girolami, and F. Vianello
Tentative Guidelines and Practical Suggestions to Avoid Venous Thromboembolism During Oral Contraceptive Therapy
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2002; 8(2): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
A. Girolami, L. Spiezia, F. Rossi, and E. Zanon
Oral Contraceptives and Venous Thromboembolism: Which Are the Safest Preparations Available?
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2002; 8(2): 157 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F.R. Rosendaal, F.M. Helmerhorst, and J.P. Vandenbroucke
Female Hormones and Thrombosis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2002; 22(2): 201 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. M Kemmeren, A. Algra, and D. E Grobbee
Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis
BMJ, July 21, 2001; 323(7305): 131 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. P. Vandenbroucke, J. Rosing, K. W.M. Bloemenkamp, S. Middeldorp, F. M. Helmerhorst, B. N. Bouma, and F. R. Rosendaal
Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Venous Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 17, 2001; 344(20): 1527 - 1535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. Jick, J. A Kaye, C. Vasilakis-Scaramozza, and S. S Jick
Risk of venous thromboembolism among users of third generation oral contraceptives compared with users of oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel before and after 1995: cohort and case-control analysis
BMJ, November 11, 2000; 321(7270): 1190 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. C G Skegg
Third generation oral contraceptives
BMJ, July 22, 2000; 321(7255): 190 - 191.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.