Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dören, M.
Right arrow Articles by Samsioe, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dören, M.
Right arrow Articles by Samsioe, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.6, No.5 pp.419-426, 2000
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2000; all rights reserved

Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis with oestrogen replacement therapy and associated compounds: update on clinical trials since 1995

M. Dören1 and G. Samsioe1

1 King's College Hospital, Department of Family Planning, London, UK 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, S-22185 Lund, Sweden

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: M. Dören , King's College Hospital, Department of Family Planning, 100 Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK. Tel: +44 20 7346 5000; Fax: +44 20 7733 2477; e-mail: martina{at}doeren.fsnet.co.uk

Abstract

Hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is generally regarded as first choice for pharmacological prevention of osteoporosis in women. We reviewed recent studies of HRT regimens and selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), including controlled trials of at least one-year duration published since 1995 until February 2000 providing data on bone mineral density (BMD) or fractures. Natural and synthetic oestrogens exert a continuum of positive effects on BMD in a dose-dependent, though non-proportional, fashion independent of age and mode of administration. Bone loss may be largely prevented by 25µg transdermal patch oestradiol, 0.3 mg conjugated equine or 0.3 mg esterified oestrogens. Progestogens neither attenuate nor augment the effect of oestrogens; sole use of tibolone prevents bone loss. Both the SERMs, tamoxifen and raloxifene, slightly increase BMD. There are no adequately powered fracture trials for any HRT regimen. Raloxifene 60 mg daily decreases the relative risk of vertebral fractures by at least 30%, as demonstrated by one 3-year fracture study of osteoporotic women. In conclusion, the recommendation to use oestrogen for postmenopausal osteoporosis, given both the lack of fracture trials and the rare trials on long-term use of HRT in (late) postmenopausal women, is not well supported. Fracture trials could overcome shortcomings of the current level of evidence.

Key words: bone mineral density / hormone replacement therapy / prevention of osteoporosis / progestogen / selective oestrogen receptor modulators


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
F. R. Rosendaal
Venous Thrombosis: The Role of Genes, Environment, and Behavior
Hematology, January 1, 2005; 2005(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Lissett and S. M. Shalet
The Impact of Dose and Route of Estrogen Administration on the Somatotropic Axis in Normal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4668 - 4672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Palomba, F. Orio Jr., A. Colao, C. di Carlo, T. Sena, G. Lombardi, F. Zullo, and P. Mastrantonio
Effect of Estrogen Replacement Plus Low-Dose Alendronate Treatment on Bone Density in Surgically Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.