Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stray-Pedersen, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stray-Pedersen, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.8, No.4 pp.385-394, 2002
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2002; all rights reserved

A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European women

J. S. Wilson1, E. Honey1, A. Templeton1, J. Paavonen2, P.-A. Mårdh3, A. Stary4 and B. Stray-Pedersen5 for the EU Biomed Concerted Action Group1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 4 Out-patient Center, Franz Jonas-Platz, Vienna, Austria 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: A. Templeton, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. e-mail: allan.templeton{at}abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

The study aim was to establish by systematic review the prevalence of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the lower female genital tract in Europe and also to assess the extent and effect of screening. The search process was wide ranging, using the electronic databases Medline, Embase and Aidsline and the Internet using the search engines Netscape and Euro-ferret. Studies published in any language during 1980–2000 were included if they unambiguously reported prevalence of C. trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women, and were assessed qualitatively. From >300 papers which quantified C. trachomatis urogenital infection, only 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: four from the UK, two from Sweden, two from The Netherlands, and one each from Bulgaria, France, Finland, Hungary, Italy and Spain. In only one study had screening taken place. The prevalence of C. trachomatis in unscreened asymptomatic women in Europe ranges from 1.7 to 17% depending upon the setting, context and country. The mode was ~6% for women seeking contraception, and 4% for women having cervical smears. In conclusion, this review confirms high prevalence rates of C. trachomatis infection among asymptomatic women in many European settings.

Key words: asymptomatic women / Chlamydia trachomatis / Europe / prevalence / screening


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
H Carre, J Boman, A Osterlund, B Garden, and E Nylander
Improved contact tracing for Chlamydia trachomatis with experienced tracers, tracing for one year back in time and interviewing by phone in remote areas
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2008; 84(3): 239 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
S. Gorander, T. Lagergard, M. Romanik, R. P. Viscidi, G. Martirosian, and J.-A. Liljeqvist
Seroprevalences of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2, Five Oncogenic Human Papillomaviruses, and Chlamydia trachomatis in Katowice, Poland
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 675 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
E Lyytikainen, M Kaasila, P Koskela, M Lehtinen, T Patama, E Pukkala, K Tasanen, H-M Surcel, and J Paavonen
Chlamydia trachomatis seroprevalence atlas of Finland 1983-2003
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2008; 84(1): 19 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
K. Jaton, J. Bille, and G. Greub
A novel real-time PCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine or genital swabs.
J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2006; 55(Pt 12): 1667 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. P. Gomes, A. Nunes, W. J. Bruno, M. J. Borrego, C. Florindo, and D. Dean
Polymorphisms in the Nine Polymorphic Membrane Proteins of Chlamydia trachomatis across All Serovars: Evidence for Serovar Da Recombination and Correlation with Tissue Tropism
J. Bacteriol., January 1, 2006; 188(1): 275 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
G. I. J. G. Rours, R. P. Verkooyen, H. F. M. Willemse, E. A. E. van der Zwaan, A. van Belkum, R. de Groot, H. A. Verbrugh, and J. M. Ossewaarde
Use of Pooled Urine Samples and Automated DNA Isolation To Achieve Improved Sensitivity and Cost-Effectiveness of Large-Scale Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in Pregnant Women
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2005; 43(9): 4684 - 4690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Noncontraceptive health benefits of combined oral contraception
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2005; 11(5): 513 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J van Bergen, H M Gotz, J H Richardus, C J P A Hoebe, J Broer, A J T Coenen, and for the PILOT CT study group
Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2005; 81(1): 17 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
H M Gotz, J E A M van Bergen, I K Veldhuijzen, J Broer, C J P A Hoebe, and J H Richardus
A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2005; 81(1): 24 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
D S LaMontagne, K A Fenton, S Randall, S Anderson, P Carter, and on behalf of the National Chlamydia Screening Stee
Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening
Sex. Transm. Inf., October 1, 2004; 80(5): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
E J Adams, A Charlett, W J Edmunds, and G Hughes
Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies
Sex. Transm. Inf., October 1, 2004; 80(5): 354 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
K A Fenton and C M Lowndes
Recent trends in the epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in the European Union
Sex. Transm. Inf., August 1, 2004; 80(4): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
V Verhoeven, D Avonts, A Meheus, H Goossens, M Ieven, S Chapelle, C Lammens, and P Van Royen
Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice
Sex. Transm. Inf., August 1, 2003; 79(4): 313 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.