Human Reproduction Update, Vol.8, No.6 pp.543-557, 2002
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2002; all rights reserved
The use of LH activity to drive folliculogenesis: exploring uncharted territories in ovulation induction
1 Reproductive Endocrinology Center 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Marco Filicori, Reproductive Endocrinology Center, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 13 40138 Bologna, Italy; e-mail: filicori{at}med.unibo.it
Abstract
LH plays critical roles in the control of folliculogenesis and ovarian function in humans. LH activity administration during gonadotrophin ovulation induction can enhance ovarian response and optimise treatment. More specifically, LH activity (both LH and low-dose hCG) can support the growth and stimulate the maturation of larger ovarian follicles as a result of specific granulosa cell receptors that develop after a few days of FSH priming. This action of LH is independent of FSH, and it has been shown recently that the last stages of follicular development can be supported by sole administration of LH activity in the form of low-dose hCG, without causing premature luteinization. Reproductively competent oocytes and pregnancy can be obtained with this regimen. Furthermore, LH activity is capable of reducing the development of small ovarian follicles (<10 mm) that may predispose patients to developing complications such as the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Thus, better understanding of the dynamics and mechanisms that control human folliculogenesis and a more rational and selective use of LH activity administration may allow a reduction in cost and increased safety, while maintaining a high efficacy of the ovulation induction regimens used in assisted reproduction.
Key words: folliculogenesis / LH activity / luteinizing hormone / ovarian function / ovulation induction
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Steckler, M. Manikkam, E. K. Inskeep, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Follicular Persistence in Prenatal Testosterone-Treated Sheep Is Not Programmed by Androgenic Actions of Testosterone Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3532 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. G. Lainas, G. K. Petsas, I. Z. Zorzovilis, G. S. Iliadis, G. T. Lainas, H. E. Cazlaris, and E. M. Kolibianakis Initiation of GnRH antagonist on Day 1 of stimulation as compared to the long agonist protocol in PCOS patients. A randomized controlled trial: effect on hormonal levels and follicular development Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1540 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Kolibianakis, E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Effect of oral contraceptive pill pretreatment on ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH for IVF. A randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Rombauts, D. Healy, R. J. Norman, and on behalf of the Orgalutran Scheduling Study Group A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 95 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Pakarainen, F.-P. Zhang, L. Nurmi, M. Poutanen, and I. Huhtaniemi Knockout of Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Abolishes the Effects of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone on Preovulatory Maturation and Ovulation of Mouse Graafian Follicles Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 19(10): 2591 - 2602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Garcia-Campayo, I. Boime, X. Ma, D. Daphna-Iken, and T. R. Kumar A Single-Chain Tetradomain Glycoprotein Hormone Analog Elicits Multiple Hormone Activities In Vivo Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 301 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Cedrin-Durnerin, D. Grange-Dujardin, A. Laffy, I. Parneix, N. Massin, J. Galey, L. Theron, J.P. Wolf, C. Conord, P. Clement, et al. Recombinant human LH supplementation during GnRH antagonist administration in IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1979 - 1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, M. Creus, D. Manau, R. Casamitjana, M. Guimera, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2689 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Young, C. L. Chaffin, T. A. Molskness, and R. L. Stouffer Controlled ovulation of the dominant follicle: a critical role for LH in the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2257 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Kilani, A. Dakkak, S. Ghunaim, G.E. Cognigni, C. Tabarelli, L. Parmegiani, and M. Filicori A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1194 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, and W. Ciampaglia Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1357 - 1358. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tesarik Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1358 - 1360. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|