Skip Navigation



Human Reproduction Update Advance Access published online on September 10, 2009

Human Reproduction Update, doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosteels, J.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosteels, J.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review

Jan Bosteels1,9, Steven Weyers2, Patrick Puttemans3, Costas Panayotidis4, Bruno Van Herendael4, Victor Gomel5, Ben W.J. Mol6, Chantal Mathieu7 and Thomas D'Hooghe8

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imeldahospital, Imeldalaan 9, 2820 Bonheiden, Belgium 2 Universitaire Vrouwenkliniek, University Hospital Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium 3 Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest 168, 3000 Leuven, Belgium 4 Endoscopic Training Centre Antwerp, ZNA Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, 2060 Antwerpen, Belgium 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, BC Women's Hospital and Women's Health Centre, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada 6 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, 1105 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands 7 Department of Endocrinology, KULeuven, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium 8 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KULeuven, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 9 Corresponding author. Tel: +32 15 505205; E-mail: jan.bosteels{at}imelda.be

BACKGROUND: Although hysteroscopy is frequently used in the management of subfertile women, a systematic review of the evidence on this subject is lacking.

METHODS: We summarized and appraised the evidence for the benefit yielded by this procedure. Our systematic search was limited to randomized and controlled studies. The QUOROM and MOOSE guidelines were followed. Language restrictions were not applied.

RESULTS: We identified 30 relevant publications. Hysteroscopic removal of endometrial polyps with a mean diameter of 16 mm detected by ultrasound doubles the pregnancy rate when compared with diagnostic hysteroscopy and polyp biopsy in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination, starting 3 months after the surgical intervention [relative risk (RR) = 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6–3.2]. In patients with one fibroid structure smaller than 4 cm, there was a marginally significant benefit from myomectomy when compared with expectant management (RR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.0–3.7). Hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus resulted in fewer pregnancies in patients with subfertility when compared with those with recurrent pregnancy loss (RR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5–0.9). Randomized controlled studies on hysteroscopic treatment of intrauterine adhesions are lacking. Hysteroscopy in the cycle preceding a subsequent IVF attempt nearly doubles the pregnancy rate in patients with at least two failed IVF attempts compared with starting IVF immediately (RR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.5–2.0).

CONCLUSIONS: Scarce evidence on the effectiveness of hysteroscopic surgery in subfertile women with polyps, fibroids, septate uterus or intrauterine adhesions indicates a potential benefit. More randomized controlled trials are needed before widespread use of hysteroscopic surgery in the general subfertile population can be justified.

Key words: hysteroscopy / subfertility / RCT / IVF / intrauterine insemination

Received on January 28, 2009; revised July 18, 2009; accepted on August 14, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.