Skip Navigation


Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2007
Human Reproduction Update 2008 14(1):27-35; doi:10.1093/humupd/dmm035
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/1/27    most recent
dmm035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szekeres-Bartho, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szekeres-Bartho, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Progestagen therapy for recurrent miscarriage

Julia Szekeres-Bartho1,3 and Juan Balasch2

1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School, Pecs University, H-7643 Pecs, Hungary 2 Institut Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), C/Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

3 Correspondence address. Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Medical School, Pecs University, 12 Szigeti Street, H-7624 Pecs, Hungary. Tel: +3672-536262; Fax: +3672-536253; E-mail: julia.szekeres{at}aok.pte.hu


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RM) affects 0.5–1% of couples. The pathophysiology of RM is complex. The suggested causes include anatomical, genetic and molecular abnormalities, endocrine disorders, thrombophilias and anti-phospholipid syndrome. In ~50% of the cases neither of the above can be identified. We aimed at examining the evidence on the role of progesterone in the pathophysiology of RM, and the clinical evidence on effectiveness of progestogen treatment.

METHODS: We searched PubMed and the Cochrane database covering the period of 1968–2007. The search terms progestogens and recurrent miscarriage, NK cells and recurrent miscarriage as well as cytokines and recurrent miscarriage were used.

RESULTS: Progesterone is indispensable for creating a suitable endometrial environment for implantation. RM may be due to subnormal progesterone secretion and retarded endometrial development in the peri-implantation period. Progesterone also acts on the immune system, mainly by affecting cytokine synthesis and the function of NK cells. A recent meta-analysis showed that though progesterone treatment did not affect pregnancy outcome in women with miscarriages in general, separate analysis of three small and dated studies including altogether 91 patients with RM revealed a small but significant effect. It is noteworthy that the design of these 40 years old studies does not meet modern requirements.

CONCLUSION: Standardized laboratory protocols for identifying potential targets of progestogen treatment as well as implementation of well-designed randomized studies are needed to establish the usefulness of progesterone supplementation in the treatment of RM.

Key words: recurrent miscarriage / progesterone / endometrial defect / decidual NK cells / cytokines


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
Definition and etiology of recurrent miscarriage

Recurrent miscarriage (RM), which is defined as three or more consecutive miscarriages before the 20th week of gestation (Mills et al., 1988Go; Brigham et al., 1999Go; Nybo Andersen et al., 2000Go) affects 0.5–1% of couples. Primary RM refers to women with no prior successful pregnancy, whereas secondary RM refers to losses following a live birth.

Both fetal and maternal factors are involved in the pathophysiology of RM. Fetal underlying mechanisms include genetic or developmental abnormalities, while uterine pathology, endocrine dysfunction, anti-phospholipid syndrome and thrombophilic disorders have been identified as maternal factors.

In ~50% of the cases neither of the above can be identified, however, since the frequency of normal embryonic karyotypes significantly increases with the number of previous miscarriages (Ogasawara et al., 2000Go), the higher the number of previous miscarriages, the more likely that the failure is due to constant maternal and not to accidentally occurring fetal factors. Concerning the underlying pathology, primary and secondary miscarriages might form two distinct categories, also suggested by their different responsiveness to therapy (Daya and Gunby and The RM Trialists Group, 1994Go; Christiansen et al., 2002Go), and although disputed the prognosis has been reported to be better for secondary than for primary recurrent aborters (Regan et al., 1989Go).

Prognosis of RM

The prognosis of RM depends on multiple factors. The risk of recurrence increases with the number of successive losses (Risch et al., 1988Go; Regan et al., 1989Go; Knudsen et al., 1991Go; Nybo Andersen et al., 2000Go). Twenty five to thirty per cent of women with three successive pre-embryonic or embryonic losses experience miscarriage in their next pregnancy (Warburton and Fraser, 1964Go; FitzSimmons et al., 1983Go). Maternal age is also a risk factor, irrespective of reproductive history (Nybo Andersen et al., 2000Go).

There is increasing evidence that progesterone exhibits anti-inflammatory activities (Piccinni et al., 1998Go, 2000Go,2001Go), which might be beneficial in the prevention of pre-term birth (Groom, 2007Go) and RM. Despite our limited understanding of the pathophysiology of ‘idiopathic’ RM, progesterone supplementation has been widely used to prevent miscarriage (Li, 1998Go).

The rationale of this treatment is to correct putatively insufficient progesterone production, which could manifest in inappropriate endometrial development or inadequate immune response to fetal antigens. Both of these are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of spontaneous miscarriage. The objective of this review is to examine the evidence on the role of progesterone in the pathophysiology of miscarriage, and the clinical evidence on whether it is effective.

Methods

We searched Pubmed and the Cochrane database covering the period of 19687–2007. The search terms progestogens and recurrent miscarriage, NK cells and recurrent miscarriage, cytokines and recurrent miscarriage were used.


    Luteal phase defect and inappropriate endometrial development
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
Endocrine background of normal endometrial development

Progesterone is indispensable for the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy. It prepares the endometrium for blastocyst implantation and controls endometrial development. The pre-ovulatory increase in the secretion of 17β-estradiol (E2) promotes the proliferation and differentiation of uterine epithelial cells. This is followed by the production of progesterone, which induces the proliferation and differentiation of stromal cells (Norwitz et al., 2001Go). Progesterone acts on the endometrium via specific receptors, the expression of which is controlled by estrogens. By down-regulating estrogen receptors, progesterone leads to a fall of both estrogen and progesterone receptors (Bergeron, 2000Go). During the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, the corpus luteum is the only source of progesterone. If pregnancy occurs, the corpus luteum continues to produce progesterone until the trophoblast takes over.

Cyclic secretion of estrogens and progesterone triggers morphological and physiological changes of the endometrium and creates during the implantation window (5–10 days after the LH surge) (Psychoyos, 1973Go) a suitable endometrial environment for embryo implantation and maintenance of early pregnancy. These changes fail to develop if progesterone production is lower than normal.

RM may be associated with retarded endometrial development in the peri-implantation period, however, not all women who miscarry show the endometrial defect, and only a part of them have lower than normal plasma progesterone concentrations (Li et al., 2000Go).

The diagnostic value of endometrial dating

In early RM, the prevalence of delayed endometrial development was found to be significantly higher (19/60), whereas that in infertile patients (46/355) did not significantly differ from the controls (1/25) (Balasch et at., 1986Go; Balasch and Vanrell, 1987Go).

In a detailed endocrinological investigation of women with unexplained RM, only 27% of the patients had a delayed endometrial development, which was still a significantly higher prevalence than the 11% found among controls. Delayed endometrial development was associated with significantly lower plasma progesterone levels, however, there was a poor association between either delayed endometrial development or low plasma progesterone levels and RM (Li et al., 2000Go). These findings show that delayed endometrial development is not necessarily due to insufficient progesterone production. A randomized multicentre study involving 619 endometrial biopsies, revealed a high percentage (49.4%) of fertile women with delayed endometrial development and concluded that endometrial dating did not discriminate between fertile and infertile women (Coutifaris et al., 2004Go). The latter could be due to false positive LH tests (Mc Govern et al., 2004Go) or observer variation (Myers et al., 2004Go). Furthermore, the system has its inherent limitations, because though certain post-ovulatory days are characterized by distinctive histological features, the in-between features are less defined and do not allow precise dating. Thus, the diagnostic value of endometrial dating is questionable. This however does not imply that that progesterone deficiency could not—by delaying endometrial development—contribute to the pathophysiology of RM.

Progesterone deficiency and RM

Several studies reported lower than normal serum progesterone concentrations in RM patients with delayed endometrium, compared with those with normal endometrium (Daya, 1989Go; Babalioglu et al., 1996Go; Li et al., 2000Go), whereas others (Vanrell and Balasch, 1986Go) failed to detect significant differences between the two groups (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1: Mid-luteal plasma progesterone concentrations in recurrent miscarriage patients with or without delayed endometrial development

 
If plasma progesterone levels are normal, the endometrium can still be progesterone deficient due to receptor abnormalities. Li et al. (2002)Go showed that in the endometrium of ~25% of women with RM the spatial expression of progesterone receptors is different from that in normal controls.

Mutations of the progesterone receptor gene could also contribute to impaired reproductive function and consequently to early abortions. Schweikert et al. (2004)Go reported on a polymorphism within the coding sequence of the human progesterone receptor gene that occurs at a significantly higher frequency in patients with RM than in controls. An inappropriate endometrial development can thus develop on the basis or progesterone receptor defects in the presence of sufficient progesterone concentrations.

These findings support the existence of absolute or relative progesterone deficiency as a biologically significant entity in recurrent first-trimester spontaneous miscarriage. In the former cases progesterone supplementation should potentially be successful. Women suffering form relative progesterone deficiency will probably not benefit from this treatment.


    Inadequate immunoregulation in the absence of progesterone
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
The feto–maternal immunological relationship

Fifty per cent of fetally derived antigens are of paternal origin. The presence of anti-fetal, -placental and -paternal antibodies in sera of women with successful pregnancies clearly shows that maternal recognition of fetal antigens does not compromise pregnancy (Billington, 1992Go); instead, it induces functional changes that allow the fetus to survive and develop.

The immuno-modulating effects of progesterone are well established. High local concentrations of progesterone prolong the survival of xenogeneic and allogeneic skin grafts as well as of xenogeneic tumour cells implanted in hamster uteri (Moriyama and Sugava, 1972Go). Ovarectomized animals treated with progesterone but not with estrogen develop uterine abscesses after injection with Escherichia coli. During the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle, the immune response is shifted towards a Th2-type response (Faas et al., 2000Go). In a prospective study Kruse et al. (2003)Go found generally lower Th1/Th2 cytokine ratios in RM patients with high- than in those with low serum progesterone levels, suggesting that serum progesterone might have an influence on cytokine production. Dydrogesterone treatment of women with pre-term delivery induces a shift in cytokine bias, by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokine production and increasing anti-inflammatory cytokine production (Raghupathy et al., 2007Go).

The effect of progesterone on the immune system of pregnant women is at least in part receptor-mediated (Szekeres-Bartho et al., 1989bGo,1990Go; Roussev et al., 1993Go; Piccinni et al., 1995Go; Chiu et al., 1996Go; Van den Heuvel et al., 1996Go). Following recognition of fetal antigens, activated maternal {gamma}/{delta} T cells express progesterone receptors (Szekeres-Bartho et al., 2001Go; Barakonyi et al., 2002Go), and upon progesterone binding under the effect of progesterone produce a mediator; named progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF) (Szekeres-Bartho et al., 1985Go,1989aGo; Polgar et al., 2003Go).

By signalling via a novel form of the IL-4 receptor (Kozma et al., 2006Go) this molecule induces a Th2-dominant cytokine response, by facilitating the production of IL-3, IL-4 and IL-10 (Szekeres-Bartho and Wegmann, 1996Go).

The effect of progesterone on maternal cytokine production

A number of studies suggest that a Th2-dominant cytokine production favours normal pregnancy, whereas an excess of Th1 cytokines leads to pregnancy termination (Wegmann et al., 1993Go; Raghupathy, 1997Go).

Women with RM have been shown to have a Thl-dominant cytokine profile (Raghupathy et al., 1999Go,2000Go; Rezaei and Dabbagh, 2002Go; Hossein et al., 2004Go; Wilson et al., 2004Go). Conflicting data, i.e. increased IL-4 and IL-10 production together with decreased IFN{gamma} and TNF{alpha} production in RM patients were reported byBates et al. (2002)Go.

In a prospective clinical trial, Raghupathy et al. (2005)Go investigated the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines from peripheral blood lymphocytes from RM women challenged in vitro to progestrone, and showed that progestogen induces PIBF production down-regulates peripheral Thl cytokines and stimulates Th2 cytokines, resulting in shift towards Th2-type immunity. Human (Kalinka and Szekeres-Bartho, 2005Go) and animal (Joachim et al., 2003Go) studies suggest that inducing PIBF production could be the indirect mechanism by which dydrogesterone improves pregnancy outcome.

The Th1/Th2 concept of normal pregnancy stems from investigating peripheral blood lymphocyte-derived cytokines. Studies on placental cytokine production have differentiated this picture and showed at the same time that—at least in mice—Th1 cytokines are not necessarily detrimental for pregnancy development, some of them, e.g. LIF and IL-11 as well as IFN{gamma}, are even necessary for implantation of the mouse blastocyst (Stewart et al., 1992Go; Bilinski et al., 1998Go; Ashkar et al., 2000Go).

Practically all cytokines appear in the human endometrium and in the decidua (Vince and Johnson, 1996Go). A growing body of evidence shows that steroid effects that control both follicular development and uterine receptivity are mediated by locally acting growth factors and cytokines. Progesterone present in the microenvironment of the decidual T cells could be responsible, at least in part, for modulating the cytokine profile (Piccinni et al., 1998Go, 2000Go, 2001Go). Progesterone at concentrations comparable to those present at the materno–fetal interface induce production of Th2-type cytokines, IL-4 and IL-5. Progesterone but neither 17β-E2 or hCG, or progesterone analogues (4-pregnen-20β-ol-3-one, 4-pregnen-20{alpha}-ol-3-one and 5-pregnen-3β-ol-20-one) favour the development of antigen-specific T cells, into Th0 cell lines and clones capable of producing IL-4 and IL-5 in addition to IFN{gamma} (Piccinni et al., 1995Go). Progesterone acts through receptors present on a substantial proportion of T blasts from established T-cell clones (Piccinni et al., 1995Go).

Two studies on endometrial cytokine expression in women with RM gave seemingly conflicting results, which can be due to the different study design and to the different methods used for cytokine detection. Lim et al. (2000)Go found that women with RM had higher level of Th1 cytokines mRNA in the peri-implantation endometrium than those with no history of RM. Shimada et al. (2004)Go reported on less IFN{gamma} and TNF{alpha} producing CD4+ endometrial T cells from women with RM compared with the control group. While the second study focused on a subset of T cells only, cytokines produced by all endometrial populations were considered in the first.

The effect of progesterone on maternal NK cells

Through altered cytokine production PIBF inhibits natural killer (NK) mediated killing in an indirect way (Szekeres-Bartho and Wegmann, 1996Go; Szekeres-Bartho et al., 1996Go).

NK cells play diverse and important roles during pregnancy. During the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle CD 56bright, CD16 and CD3 negative granulated NK cells appear in the endometrium, and remain there until onset of menses, or if pregnancy occurs, increase in number, to become the predominant uterine lymphocytes of early pregnancy (King et al., 1998Go). They secrete an array of angiogenic factors and the dynamics of their appearance suggests that one of their functions might be the control of placentation. Decidual NK cells are believed to control trophoblast invasion through the production of immunoregulatory cytokines and angiogenic factors (Hanna et al., 2006Go; Sargent et al., 2006Go). Decidual NK cells do not express progesterone receptors (Henderson et al., 2003Go), however, progesterone affects both the number and function of these cells in an indirect way. The rapid increase of NK cell counts in the early decidua is thought to be due to proliferation of the resident population, and/or recruitment of CD56(bright) lymphocytes from the circulation. Progesterone (together with estrogen and LH) plays a role in potential uterine homing of NK cells (Van den Heuvel et al., 2005Go). NK cells express chemokine receptors thus can be induced to migrate in response to several chemokines (Campbell et al., 2001Go). Trophoblast and placenta produce chemokines that may recruit blood NK cells into the decidua during pregnancy (Drake et al., 2001Go; Hanna et al., 2003Go). Progesterone induces CXCL10 and 11 production by endometrial cells, and NK cell migration to the endometrium is supported by these sex- hormone-induced chemokines (Sentman et al., 2004Go).

Hoxa-10, a developmentally regulated homeobox transcription factor is highly expressed in decidualizing stromal cells. Progesterone and, to a lesser extent, estrogen induce Hoxa-10 expression. Hoxa-10 knock-out mice show severe decidualization defects, primarily due to reduced stromal cell responsiveness to progesterone (Lim et al., 1999Go). Hoxa-10 deficiency interferes with NK cell differentiation without affecting the migration of NK precursors into the decidua (Rahman et al., 2006Go). Furthermore, gene expression profiling revealed that, at the time of implantation, Hoxa-10 mediates the progesterone-stimulated proliferation of uterine stromal cells (Yao et al., 2003Go).

Potential cytotoxic mechanisms exerted by NK cells can damage the trophoblast and induce ablation of placenta. In spite of their high perforin content decidual NK cells show a low spontaneous cytotoxic activity (Crncic et al., 2006Go). The embryonic trophoblast that forms the interface between the maternal and fetal compartments could be the site of fetal antigen presentation, and also the expected target of maternal anti-fetal effector mechanisms. Syncyctiotrophoblast and villous cytotrophoblast are devoid of HLA antigens, whereas extravillous cytotrophoblast cells do express HLA-C and the non-polymorphic molecules; HLA-G and HLA-E (Hedley et al., 1989Go; Kovats et al., 1990Go; Le Bouteiller, 1994Go,1996Go; Hammer et al., 1997Go; Billington, 1999Go).

HLA-G presents antigens and plays a role in the regulation of HLA-E expression (Le Bouteiller et al., 2003Go; Sala et al., 2004Go). HLA-G or HLA-E binding by inhibitory receptors of decidual NK cells conveys a negative signal and thus might induce resistance of the trophoblast to NK-mediated lysis (Moretta et al., 1993Go; Braud et al., 1998Go; Lee et al., 1998Go; Llano et al., 1998Go).

Another mechanism by which HLA-G expressing cells might protect themselves against immune aggression lies in inducing regulatory cells (LeMaoult et al., 2007Go). Furthermore, soluble HLA-G1 exerts different immunoregulatory functions via different immune targets, including T cells and dendritic cells (Hunt et al., 2005Go), as well as anti-angiogenic effects (Fons et al., 2006Go).

Recently, Yie et al. (2006)Go reported that progesterone up-regulates HLA-G gene expression through a novel progesterone response element. Increased expression of HLA-G—by generating regulatory cells and modulating dendritic cell T cell and NK activity—might contribute to the favourable microenvironment in the decidua. Thus one of the sites of progesterone action in promoting normal gestation is regulation of HLA-G gene expression.

RM is associated with an increased number of endometrial NK cells (Quenby et al., 1999Go), and decidual lymphocytes from failed pregnancies contain less perforin than those from normal pregnancy deciduas (Gulan et al., 1997Go), suggesting that an increased rate of degranulation takes place in the former case. Furthermore, a dominant population of TGF-β-producing NK3 type cells in normal decidua is significantly reduced in deciduas from women with RM (Higuma Myojo et al., 2005Go). Other studies have shown RM patients having fewer CD56-bright NK cells in the preimplantation endometrium than controls (Lachapelle et al., 1996Go), and patients who miscarried chromosomally normal embryos had decreased percentage of CD56+ decidual NK cells compared with those who miscarried chromosomally abnormal embryos (Yamamoto et al., 1999Go; Quack et al., 2001Go). It should however be kept in mind that the changes observed in miscarriage placentae could be due to the necrosis and inflammation following the death of the embryo, thus they might be the result, rather than the cause of miscarriage. Therefore, these findings must be interpreted with caution.

The relative ratio of two putative, functionally distinct decidual NK cell populations might thus determine the fate of the fetus, or alternatively, the loss of control due to progesterone deficiency and consequently impaired HLA-G expression might result in proliferation and activation of decidual NK cells.

In pregnant mice, neutralization of endogenous PIBF activity by specific anti-PIBF antibody causes a significant reduction in the number of viable fetuses, and this is associated with an increased splenic NK activity, together with reduced IL-10 and increased IFN{gamma} production of the spleen cells (Szekeres-Bartho et al., 1997bGo). Ninety per cent of pregnancy loss is corrected by treatment of the pregnant animals with anti-NK antibodies (Szekeres-Bartho, 1997aGo). These data suggest that in mice PIBF contributes to the success of pregnancy and that the major part of its pregnancy-protective effect lies in keeping NK activity under restraint.

RM may also be associated with an adverse immune reaction to progesterone. An interesting study revealed that out of 29 women with RM, 23 and 20 showed an allergic skin reaction to estrogen and progesterone, respectively, whereas no such reaction was observed in the controls (Istekson et al., 2007Go). The underlying mechanism might be that anti-progesterone immunity that emerges in these patients impairs the physiological functions of progesterone.


    Progesterone treatment of RM—clinical trials
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
While there is an accepted causative therapeutic protocol for each group of women with RM of known pathophysiology, there is none for recurrent spontaneous miscarriages of unknown aetiology.

Progesterone treatment could be efficient, if continuation of pregnancy is threatened by insufficient progesterone production, which might result in inappropriate endometrial development, or the failure of the immune system to adapt to the new situation created by the presence of the fetus. The possible sites of action of progesterone are summarized in Fig. 1.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1: Sites of action of progesterone in establishment and maintenance of pregnancy

The progesterone-induced transcription factor Hoxa-10 is needed for the differentiation of decidual NK cells, while progesterone promotes NK cell trafficking from peripheral blood to the decidua. Both accumulation of decidual NK cells and the direct effect of progesterone are required for normal endometrial development. By up-regulating HLA-G—the ligand of NK cell inhibitory receptors—on the trophoblast, progesterone inhibits NK mediated lysis. PIBF—produced under progesterone effect-establishes a Th2-dominant cytokine pattern, which controls the cytotoxic potential of NK cells; PIBF, progesterone induced blocking factor

 
For more than five decades, progesterone has been administered orally, intramuscularly and vaginally in an attempt to prevent miscarriage in early-to-mid pregnancy. Early studies of progesterone supplementation reported improved pregnancy outcomes in treated women (Tho et al., 1983Go; Daya et al., 1988Go). Two meta-analyses of randomized trials, Goldstein et al. (1989)Goand Daya (1989)Go gave conflicting results. The meta-amalysis of Goldstein et al. (1989)Go showed no benefit when progesterone was used to maintain early pregnancies, whereas Daya (1989)Go reported that progesterone supplementation significantly improved pregnancy outcome in women with RM. The Goldstein analysis combined the data from 15 very heterogenous studies on ‘high risk’ pregnancies including previous miscarriage, stillbirth or present pre-term labour. Only the pre-term delivery versus the term delivery comparison approached statistical significance.

In Daya’s meta-analysis, three controlled trials of progesterone treatment in women with RM have shown small, but not statistically significant, increases in the rates of pregnancies that continued beyond 20 weeks in the treated groups. None of these studies had sufficient statistical power to detect a clinically significant improvement in outcome, but pooling the results of these studies using the principles of meta-analysis have allowed an overall effect of treatment to be calculated. The resulting odds ratio (ORs) for pregnancies reaching at least 20 weeks gestation was 3.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28, 7.42].

A meta-analysis (Oates-Whitehead et al., 2003Go) including 14 trials (1988 women) revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of miscarriage between progestogen and placebo or no treatment groups (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.83, 1.34), when all women, regardless of gravidity and number of previous miscarriages, were included in the meta-analysis.

On the other hand, in a subgroup analysis of three trials (Swyer and Daley, 1953Go; Goldzieher, 1964Go; Le Vine, 1964Go) involving 91 women who had RM, progestogen treatment showed a statistically significant decrease in miscarriage rate compared with placebo or no treatment (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17, 0.91).

In all of the mentioned meta-analyses the same three (>40 years old) placebo-controlled trials were included, and the design of these studies is not acceptable by modern standards (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2: Design characteristics of the progesterone-treatment of recurrent miscarriage studies

 
Two of these studies (Goldzieher, 1964Go; Le Vine, 1964Go) were randomized placebo-controlled and double-blinded, but in both of them the allocation methodology was unclear. The third study (Swyer and Daley, 1953Go) was not placebo-controlled, the method of randomization is not stated, allocation concealment was clearly inadequate and it was unclear whether any blinding was used. Only one of the three studies (Goldzieher, 1964Go) was three or more consecutive miscarriages an inclusion criterian. The other two studies included women with two or more consecutive miscarriages.

No statistically significant differences were found between the route of administration of progestogen (oral, intramuscular or vaginal) versus placebo or no treatment. No side effects of progesterone were reported.

In a recent study (not included in the meta-analysis) conducted by El Zibdeh (2005)Go, 180 women with a history of recurrent, unexplained spontaneous miscarriage were randomized according to the day of the week the women attended the clinic to receive oral dydrogesterone, intramuscular human chorionic gonadotrophin or no additional treatment. Miscarriages were significantly (P≤ 0.05) less common in the dydrogesterone group (11/82, 13.4%) than in the control group (14/48, 29%); there were no statistically significant differences between the hCG group and the control group. Neither were there any differences between the groups with respect to pregnancy complications or congenital abnormalities. This study was however neither placebo- controlled, nor blinded.

The extensive use of progestational agents during the first and second trimester of pregnancy in attempt to prevent miscarriage showed that this treatment is not associated with adverse effects in the mothers. However, Carmichael et al. (2005)Go have recently reported that maternal intake of progestins in early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of hypospadiasis in the male offspring (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.3, 6.0).

Participants of an international workshop on the evidence-based management of recurrent pregnancy loss called attention to methodological problems threatening the validity of research in this field (Christiansen et al., 2005Go). The most important of these concerns is patient selection criteria. The validity of research is often hampered by an incorrect diagnosis, due to faulty recall of the pregnancy history, or classification of biochemical pregnancies as miscarriages. The term miscarriage is used to describe a pregnancy that fails to progress, resulting in the death and expulsion of the embryo or fetus. The generally accepted definition stipulates that the fetus or embryo should weigh ≤500 g (World Health Organization, 1977Go), a stage that corresponds to a gestational age of ≤20 weeks. Only patients fulfilling these criteria of RM should be enrolled. Delayed menstruation or biochemical pregnancies should not be included in the studies, since they might have different aetiologies.

The above notwithstanding, the following facts should be considered when analyzing studies on RM. First, the only study design that would be acceptable for such a therapeutic intervention would be a randomized controlled trial, which would exclude any sort of matching. One would expect that random allocation would achieve balance in both number of abortions and age. If the factors were by chance not balanced between the groups, a regression analysis would be necessary to adjust for the imbalance. Of course, stratification is possible for both number of abortions and age (as well as primary versus secondary miscarriage), but power considerations limit the number of stratification factors. Second, it is feasible and acceptable when there is a strong prognostic factor such as primary versus secondary miscarriage, to stratify the random list by that factor in order to ensure balance between the groups and allow for an analysis of the interaction between the treatment and the prognostic factor. Third, it is a principle of randomized trial design that all procedures must be the same for both treatment and control groups. It is to note that samples of human beings are always heterogeneous, even when all patients begin with the same clinical diagnosis. The intervention must be robust enough to overcome this heterogeneity or it will be useless in practice. If we knew which patients would be the responders the trial would not be necessary. Ideally, further studies on progesterone therapy for RM should consider all these potential variables. Finally, double blinding is an indispensable element of a randomized controlled trial to ensure unbiased co-interventions, monitoring, as well as outcome and adverse effect observations.

In conclusion, well-designed randomized studies are needed to provide robust and reliable evidence for the usefulness of progesterone supplementation in the treatment of RM. Laboratory tests including determinations of NK function and cytokine production should be performed on the same patients, according to standardized protocols, to answer the question, whether these parameters are of any value in identifying patients who would respond to progestogen therapy. The usefulness of PIBF measurement in early pregnancy is currently under evaluation (Walch et al., 2005Go).


    Glossary
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
T helper cells (Th cells) like all T cells express the T-cell receptor (TCR)/CD3 complex, as well as the surface protein CD4. They have no cytotoxic or phagocytic activity rather they are involved in activating and directing other immune cells. They are essential in B- cell activation, in the activation and growth of cytotoxic T cells. They act on other cells via cytokines. Th1 cells produce cytokines that promote the development of a cell-mediated response, whereas Th2 cell cytokines act in favour of B cells activation and immunoglobulin production.

Regulatory T cells are a specialized subpopulation of T cells that suppress immune responses of other cells. Their role is to close down immune responses after they have successfully fulfilled their task, e.g. eliminating pathogens.

The majority of peripheral blood T cells express a TCR composed of two glycoprotein chains called {alpha}- and β-TCR chains. {gamma}{delta} T cells, express another type of receptor composed of a {gamma}-chain and a {delta}-chain. The latter cells constitute a minor subset in peripheral blood, however, they are abundant at the mucosal surfaces and in the skin, and thought to play a major role in mucosal immunity. In contrast to {alpha}/β T cells, for antigen recognition they do not require antigen processing and MHC presentation of peptide epitopes. Furthermore, {gamma}{delta} T cells are believed to have a prominent role in recognition of lipid antigens. {gamma}{delta} T cells exhibit several characteristics that place them at the border between the rapidly responding innate immune system and the highly specific but slower adaptive immune system.

NK cells are a form of cytotoxic lymphocytes which constitute a major component of the innate immune system. NK cells play a major role in the rejection of tumours and virus-infected cells. NK cells kill by releasing perforin and granzyme that cause lysis or apoptosis of the target cell. In the endometrium and in the decidua there is a specialized population of NK cells. While, ~90% of human peripheral NK cells express low density of the CD56 surface marker (CD56dim) and high levels of the FCgRIII (CD16), the majority of decidual NK cells express high density of the CD56 molecule (CD56bright) and no CD16.

Peripheral CD56dim NK cells are granular and known to be cytotoxic, while CD56bright peripheral NK do not contain granules and are non-cytotoxic, but display an imunoregulatory role via cytokine production. Decidual NK cells resemble the CD56bright peripheral NK subset in their CD56bright CD16neg phenotype but, unlike the former, they contain cytotoxic granules. Among the genes selectively over-expressed in decidual NK are secreted proteins with known immunosuppressive activity, suggesting that decidual NK might contribute to the generation of an immunosuppressive environment at the maternal fetal interface.


    Funding
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 
The author is the member of a European Network of Excellence on Embryo Implantation Control supported by EU. Contr. No; 512040. This work was supported by grants from Hungarian Natl Research Fund (OTKA T031737), Hungarian Ministry of Health (ETT 045/2003), National Research and Development Program (NKFP 1A-057-2004), Economic Competitiveness Operative Program (GVOP-3.1.1.-2004-05-0329/3.0), and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Luteal phase defect and...
 Inadequate immunoregulation in...
 Progesterone treatment of RM-...
 Glossary
 Funding
 References
 

    Ashkar AA, Di Santo JP, Croy BA. Interferon gamma contributes to initiation of uterine vascular modification, decidual integrity, and uterine natural killer cell maturation during normal murine pregnancy. J Exp Med (2000) 192:259–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Babalioglu R, Varol FG, Ilhan R, Yalcin O, Cizmecioglu F. Progesterone profiles in luteal-phase defects associated with recurrent spontaneous abortions. J Assist Reprod Genet (1996) 13:306–309.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Balasch J, Vanrell JA. Corpus luteum insufficiency and fertility: a matter of controversy. Hum Reprod (1987) 2:557–567.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Balasch J, Creus M, Márquez M, Burzaco I, Vanrell JA. The significance of luteal phase deficiency on fertility: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Hum Reprod (1986) 1:145–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Barakonyi A, Kovacs KT, Miko E, Szereday L, Varga P, Szekeres-Bartho J. Recognition of non-classical HLA class I antigens by {gamma}/{delta} T cells during pregnancy. J Immunol (2002) 168:2683–2688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bates MD, Quenby S, Takakuwa K, Johnson PM, Vince GS. Aberrant cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in recurrent pregnancy loss? Hum Reprod (2002) 17:2439–2444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bergeron C. Morphological changes and protein secretion induced by progesterone in the endometrium during the luteal phase in preparation for nidation. Hum Reprod (2000) 15(Suppl):119–128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Bilinski P, Roopenian D, Gossler A. Maternal IL-11Ralpha function is required for normal decidua and fetoplacental development in mice. Genes Dev (1998) 12:2234–2243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Billington WD. Transfer of antigens and antibodies between mother and foetus. In: Immunological Obstetrics—Coulam CB, Faulk WP, McIntyre J, eds. (1992) New York: W.W. Norton & Co. 290–304.

    Billington WD. The nature and possible functions of MHC antigens on the surface of human trophoblast. Reproductive Immunology—Gupta SK, ed. (1999) New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House. 71–78.

    Braud VM, Allan DS, O’Callaghan CA, Söderström K, D’Andrea A, Ogg GS, Lazetic S, Young NT, Bell JI, Phillips JH, et al. HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature (1998) 391:795–799.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic RM. Hum Reprod (1999) 14:2868–2877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Campbell JJ, Quin S, Unutmaz D, Soler S, Murphy KE, Hodge MR, Wu L, Butcher EC. Unique subpopulations of CD56+ NK and NK-T peripheral blood lymphocytes identified by chemokine receptor expression repertoire. J Immunol (2001) 166:6477–6482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Laurent C, Croughan MS, Olney RS, Lammer EJ. Maternal progestin intake and risk of hypospadias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med (2005) 159:957–962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Chiu L, Nishimura M, Ishi Y, Nieda M, Maeshima M, Takedani Y, Tadokoro K, Juji T. Enhancement of the expression of progesterone receptor on progesterone -treated lymphocytes after immunotherapy in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol (1996) 35:552–557.[Medline]

    Christiansen OB, Pedersen B, Rosgaard A, Husth M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in the prevention of RM: evidence for a therapeutic effect in women with secondary RM. Hum Reprod (2002) 17:809–816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Christiansen OB, Nybo Andersen AM, Bosch E, Daya S, Delves PJ, Hviid TV, Kutteh WH, Laird SM, Li TC, van der Ven K. Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril (2005) 83:821–839.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, Diamond MP, Carson S, Legro R, Mc Govern P, S Schlaff W, Carr BR, Steinkampf MP, et al. Histology dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril (2004) 82:1264–1272.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Crncic TB, Laskarin G, Frankovic KJ, Tokmadzic VS, Strobo N, Bedenicki I, Le Bouteiller P, Tabiasco J, Rukavina D. Early pregnancy decidual lymphocytes beside perforin use Fas ligand (FasL) mediated cytotoxicity. J Reprod Immunol (2007) 73:108–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Daya S. Efficacy of progesterone support for pregnancy in women with RM. A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynecol (1989) 96:275–280.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Daya S, Ward S, Burrows E. Progesterone profiles in luteal phase defect cycles and outcome of progesterone treatment in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1988) 158:225–232.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Daya S, Gunby J, The RM Trialists Group. The effectiveness of allogeneic leukocyte immunization in unexplained primary recurrent abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol (1994) 32:294–302.[Medline]

    Drake PM, Gunn MD, Charo IF, Tsou CL, Zhou Y, Huang L, Fisher SJ. Human placental cytotrophoblasts attract monocytes and CD56(bright) natural killer cells via the actions of monocyte inflammatory protein 1alpha. J Exp Med (2001) 193:1199–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    El-Zibdeh MY. Dydrogesterone in the reduction of recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2005) 97:431–434.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Faas M, Bouman A, Moesa H, Heineman MJ, de Leij L, Schuiling G. The immune response during the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle: a Th2-type response? Fertil Steril (2000) 74:1008–1013.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    FitzSimmons J, Jackson D, Wapner R, Jackson L. Subsequent reproductive outcome in couples with repeated pregnancy loss. Am J Med Genet (1983) 16:583–587.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Fons P, Chabot S, Cartwright JE, Lenfan F, L’Faqihi F, Giustiniani J, Herault JP, Gueguen G, Bono F, Savi P, et al. Soluble HLA-G1 inhibits angiogenesis through an apoptotic pathway and by direct binding to CD160 receptor expressed by endothelial cells. Blood (2006) 108:2608–2615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Goldstein P, Berrier J, Rosen S, Sack S, Sacks HS, Chalmers TC. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of progestational agents in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol (1989) 96:265–274.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Goldzieher JW. Double-blind trial of a progestin in habitual abortion. J Am Med Assoc (1964) 188:651–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Groom KM. Pharmacological prevention of prematurity. Best Parct Res Clin Obstet Gynecol (2007) 21:843–856.[CrossRef]

    Gulan G, Podack ER, Rukavina D, Gudelj L, Rubesa G, Petrovic O. Perforin-expressing lymphocytes in peripheral blood and decidua of human first-trimester pathological pregnancies. Am J Reprod Immunol (1997) 38:9–18.[Medline]

    Hammer A, Hutter H, Dohr G. HLA class I expression on the materno-fetal interface. Am J Reprod Immunol (1997) 38:150–157.[Medline]

    Hanna J, Wald O, Goldman-Wohl D, Prus D, Markel G, Gazit R, Katz G, Haimov-Kochman R, Fujii N, Yagel S, et al. CXCL12 expression by invasive trophoblasts induces the specific migration of CD16- human natural killer cells. Blood (2003) 102:1569–1577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Hanna J, Goldman-Wohl D, Hamani Y, Avraham I, Greenfield C, Nathanson-Yaron S, Prus D, Cohen-Daniel L, Arnon TI, Manaster I, et al. Decidual NK cells regulate key developmental processes at the human fetal-maternal interface. Nat Med (2006) 12:1065–1074.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Hedley ML, Drake BL, Head JR, Tucker W, Forman J. Differential expression of class I MHC genes in the embryo and placenta during midgestational development in the mouse. J Immunol (1989) 142:4046–4053.[Abstract]

    Henderson TA, Saunders PT, Moffet-King A, Groome NP, Critchley HO. Steroid receptor expression in uterine natural killer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88:440–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Higuma-Myojo S, Sasaki Y, Miyazaki S, Sakai M, Siozaki A, Miwa N, Saito S. Cytokine profile of natural killer cells in early human pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol (2005) 54:21–29.[Medline]

    Hossein H, Mahroo M, Abbas A, Firouzeh A, Nadia H. Cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in RM. Cytokine (2004) 28:83–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Hunt JS, Petroff MG, McIntire RH, Ober C. HLA-G and immune tolerance in pregnancy. FASEB J (2005) 19:681–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Istekson AM, Seidman DS, Zolti M, Lazarov A, Carp HJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss and inappropriate local immune response to sex hormones. Am J Reprod Immunol (2007) 57:160–165.[Medline]

    Joachim R, Zenclussen AC, Polgar B, Douglas AJ, Fest S, Knackstedt M, Klapp BF, Arck PC. The progesterone derivative dydrogesterone abrogates murine stress-triggered abortion by inducing a Th2 biased local immune response. Steroids (2003) 68:931–940.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Kalinka J, Szekeres-Bartho J. The impact of dydrogesterone supplementation on hormonal profile and progesterone-induced blocking factor concentrations in women with threatened abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol (2005) 53:166–171.[Medline]

    King A, Burrows T, Verma S, Hiby S, Loke YW. Human uterine lymphocytes. Hum Reprod Update (1998) 4:480–485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Knudsen UB, Hansen V, Juul S, Secher NJ. Prognosis of a new pregnancy following previous spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (1991) 39:31–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Kovats S, Main EK, Librach C, Stubbelbine M, Fisher SJ, Demars R. A class I antigen, HLA-G is expressed on human trophoblast. Science (1990) 248:220–223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kozma N, Halasz M, Polgar B, Poehlmann TG, Markert UR, Palkovics T, Keszei M, Kiss K, Szeberenyi J, Par G, et al. PIBF activates STAT6 via binding to a novel IL-4 receptor. J Immunol (2006) 176:819–826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Kruse C, Varming K, Christiansen OB. Prospective, serial investigations of in-vitro lymphocyte cytokine production, CD62L expression and proliferative response to microbial antigens in women with RM. Hum Reprod (2003) 18:2465–2472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Lachapelle MH, Miron P, Hemmings R, Roy DC. Endometrial T, B, and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered profile and pregnancy outcome. J Immunol (1996) 156:4027–4034.[Abstract]

    Le Bouteiller P. HLA class I chromosomal region, genes and products: facts and questions. Crit Rev Immunol (1994) 14:89–129.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Le Bouteiller P, Rodriguez AM, Mallet V, Girr M, Guillaudeux T, Lnefant F. Placental expression of HLA class I genes. Am J Reprod Immunol (1996) 35:216–225.[Medline]

    Le Bouteiller P, Legrand-Abravanel F, Solier C. Soluble HLA-G1 at the materno-foetal interface. Placenta (2003) 24(Suppl_A):S10–S15.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Lee N, Llano M, Carretero M, Ishitani A, Navarro F, López-Botet M, Geraghty D. HLA-E is a major ligand for the natural killer inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1998) 95:5199–5204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    LeMaoult J, Caumartin J, Daouya M, Favier B, Le Rond S, Gonzalez A, Carosella ED. Immune regulation by pretenders: cell-to-cell transfers of HLA-G make effector T cells act as regulatory cells. Blood (2007) 109:2040–2048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Le Vine L. Habitual abortion. A controlled clinical study of progestational therapy. Western J Surg (1964) 72:30–36.[Medline]

    Li TC. Recurrent miscarriage: principles of management. Hum Reprod (1998) 13:478–482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Li TC, Spuijbroek MD, Tuckerman E, Anstie B, Loxley M, Laird S. Endocrinological and endometrial factors in RM. BJOG (2000) 107:1471–1479.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Li TC, Tuckerman EM, Laird SM. Endometrial factors in RM. Hum Reprod Update (2002) 1:43–52.

    Lim H, Ma L, Ma WG, Maas RL, Dey SK. Hoxa-10 regulates uterine stromal cell responsiveness to progesterone during implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Mol Endocrinol (1999) 13:1005–1017.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Lim KJ, Odukoya OA, Ajjan RA, Li TC, Weetman AP, Cooke ID. The role of T-helper cytokines in human reproduction. Fertil Steril (2000) 73:136–142.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Llano M, Lee N, Navarro F, Garcia P, Alber JP, Geraghty DE, Lopez-Botet M. HLA-E-bound peptides influence recognition by inhibitory and triggering CD94/NKG2 receptors: preferential response to an HLA-G-derived nonamer. Eur J Immunol (1998) 28:2854–2863.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    McGovern PG, Myers ER, Silva S, Coutifaris C, Carson SA, Legro RS, Schlaff WD, Carr BR, Steinkampf MP, Giudice LC, et al, NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Absence of secretory endometrium after false-positive home urine luteinizing hormone testing. Fertil Steril (2004) 82:1273–1277.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, Jovanic-Peterson L, Van Allen M, Aarons JH, Metzger B, Bieberf FR, Knopp RH, Holmes LB, et al. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med (1988) 319:1617–1623.[Abstract]

    Moretta A, Vitale M, Bottino C, Orengo AM, Morelli L, Augugliaro R, Barbaresi M, Ciccone E, Moretta L. P58 molecules as putative receptors for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules in human natural killer (NK) cells. Anti-p58 antibodies reconstitute lysis of MHC class I-protected cells in NK clones displaying different specificities. J Exp Med (1993) 178:597–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Moriyama I, Sugawa T. Progesterone facilitates implantation of xenogeneic cultured cells in hamster uterus. Nat New Biol (1972) 236:150–152.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Myers ER, Silva S, Barnhart K, Groben PA, Richardson MS, Robboy SJ, Leppert P, Coutifaris C, NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women. Fertil Steril (2004) 82:1278–1282.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Norwitz ER, Schust DJ, Fischer SJ. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:1400–1408.[Free Full Text]

    Nybo Andersen AM, Woglfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ (2000) 320:1708–1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Oates-Whitehead RM, Haas DM, Carrier JA. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2003) (4):CD003511.

    Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril (2000) 73:300–304.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Piccinni M-P, Giudizi MG, Biagiotti R, Beloni L, Giannarini L, Sampognaro S, Parronchi P, Manetti R, Livi C, Romagnani S, et al. Progesterone favors the development of human T helper cells producing Th2-type cytokines and promotes both IL-4 production and membrane CD30 expression in established Th1 cells clones. J Immunol (1995) 155:128–133.[Abstract]

    Piccinni MP, Beloni L, Livi C, Maggi E, Scarselli G, Romagnani S. Defective production of both leukemia inhibitory factor and type 2 T-helper cytokines by decidual T cells in unexplained recurrent abortions. Nat Med (1998) 4:1020–1024.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Piccinni MP, Scarlett C, Maggi E, Romagnani S. Role of hormone-controlled Th1- and Th2-type cytokines in successful pregnancy. J Neuroimmunol (2000) 109:30–33.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Piccinni MP, Scarletti C, Mavilia C, Lazerri E, Romagnani P, Natali I, Pellegrini S, Livi C, Romagnani S, Maggi E. Production of IL-4 and leukemia inhibitory factor by T cells of the cumulus oophorus: a favorable microenvironment for pre-implantation embryo development. Eur J Immunol (2001) 31:2431–2437.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Polgar B, Kispal Gy, Lachmann M, Paar C, Nagy E, Csere P, Miko E, Szereday L, Varga P, Szekeres-Bartho J. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel cDNA coding for PIBF. J Immunol (2003) 171:5956–5963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Psychoyos A. Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm (1973) 31:201–256.[Medline]

    Quack KC, Vassiliadou N, Pudney J, Anderson DJ, Hill JA. Leukocyte activation in the decidua of chromosomally normal and abnormal fetuses from women with recurrent abortion. Hum Reprod (2001) 16:949–955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Quenby S, Bates M, Doig T, Brewster J, Lewis-Jones DI, Johnson PM, Vince G. Pre-implantation endometrial leukocytes in women with RM. Hum Reprod (1999) 14:2386–2391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Raghupathy R. Th-1 type immunity is incompatible with successful pregnancy. Immunol Today (1997) 18:478–482.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Raghupathy R, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Hassan N, Al-Azemi M, Al-Shamali E. Maternal Th1- and Th2-type reactivity to placental antigens in normal human pregnancy and unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Cell Immunol (1999) 196:122–130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Raghupathy R, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Omu A, Gupta M, Farhat R. Cytokine production by maternal lymphocytes during normal human pregnancy and in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Hum Reprod (2000) 15:713–718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Raghupathy R, Al Mutawa E, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Szekeres-Bartho J. Modulation of cytokine production by dydrogesterone in lymphocytes from women with recurrent abortion. Br J Obstet Gynecol (2005) 112:1096–1101.

    Raghupathy R, Al Mutawa E, Maksheed M, Al-Azemi M, Azizeh F. Redirection of cytokine production by lymphocytes from women with pre-term delivery by dydrogesterone. Am J Reprod Immunol (2007) 58:31–38.[Medline]

    Rahman MA, Li M, Li P, Wang H, Dey SK, Da SK. Hoxa-10 deficiency alters region-specific gene expression and perturbs differentiation of natural killer cells during decidualization. Dev Biol (2006) 290:105–117.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Regan L, Braude PR, Tremblath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ (1989) 299:541–545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Rezaei A, Dabbagh A. T-helper (1) cytokines increase during early pregnancy in women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Med Sci Monit (2002) 8:CR607–10.[Medline]

    Risch HA, Weiss NS, Clarke EA, Miller AB. Risk factors for spontaneous abortion and its recurrence. Am J Epidemiol (1988) 128:420–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Roussev RG, Higgins NG, McIntyre JA. Phenotypic characterization of normal human placental mononuclear cells. J Reprod Immunol (1993) 25:15–29.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Sala FG, Moral PM, Pizzato N, Legrand-Abravanel F, Le Bouteiller P, Lenfant F. The HLA-G*0105 N null allele induces cell surface expression of HLA-E molecule and promotes CD94/NKG2A-mediated recognition in JAR choriocarcinoma cell line. Immunogenetics (2004) 56:617–624.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Sargent IL, Borzychowski AM, Redman CW. Immunoregulation in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: an overview. Reprod Biomed Online (2006) 13:80–86.

    Schweikert A, Rau T, Berkholz A, Allera A, Daufeld S, Wildt L. Association of progesterone receptor polymorphism with recurrent abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2004) 113:67–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Sentman CL, Meadows SK, Wira CR, Eriksson M. Recruitment of uterine NK cells: induction of CXC Chemokine ligands 10 and 11 inhuman endometrium by estradiol and progesterone. J Immunol (2004) 173:6760–6766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Shimada S, Kato EH, Mirikawa M, Iwabuchi K, Nishida R, Kishi R, Onoe K, Minkami H, Yamada H. No difference in natural killer or natural killer T-cell population, but aberrant T-helper cell population in the endometrium of women with repeated miscarriage. Hum Reprod (2004) 19:1018–1024.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Stewart CL, Kaspar P, Brunet LJ, Bhatt H, Gadi I, Kontgen F, Abbondazo SJ. Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature (1992) 359:76–79.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Swyer GIM, Daley D. Progesterone implantation in habitual abortion. BMJ (1953) 1:1073–1086.[Free Full Text]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Wegmann TG. A progesterne-dependent immunomodulatory protein alters the Th1/Th2 balance. J Reprod Immunol (1996) 31:81–95.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Kilar F, Falkay G, Csernus V, Torok A, Pacsa AS. Progesterone-treated lymphocytes of healthy pregnant women release a factor inhibiting cytotoxicity and prostaglandin synthesis. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol (1985) 9:15–19.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Autran B, Debre P, Andreu G, Denver L, Chaouat G. Immunoregulatory effects of a suppressor factor from healthy pregnant women s lymphocytes after progesterone induction. Cell Immunol (1989) a122:281–294.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Reznikoff-Etievant MF, Varga P, Pichon MF, Varga Z, Chaouat G. Lymphocytic progesterone receptors in normal and pathological human pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol (1989) b16:239–247.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Szekeres Gy, Debre P, Autran B, Chaouat G. Reactivity of lymphocytes to a progesterone receptor-specific monoclonal antibody. Cell Immunol (1990) 125:273–283.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Faust Zs, Varga P, Szereday L, Kelemen K. The immunological pregnancy protective effect of progesterone is manifested via controlling cytokine production. Am J Reprod Immunol (1996) 35:348–351.[Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Par G, Dombay Gy, Smart YC, Volgyi Z. The anti-abortive effect of PIBF in mice is manifested by modulating NK activity. Cell Immunol (1997) a177:194–199.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Par G, Szereday L, Smart CY, Achacz I. Progesterone and non-specific immunological mechanisms in pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol (1997) b38:176–180.[Medline]

    Szekeres-Bartho J, Barakonyi A, Miko E, Polgar B, Palkovics T. The role of {gamma}/{delta} T cells in the feto-maternal relationship. Seminars in Immunology. Semin Immunol (2001) 13:229–233.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Tho SP, Reindollar RH, McDonough PG. Recurrent abortion. Gynecol Annu (1983) 12:259–281.

    Van den Heuvel M, McBey B-A, Hahnel AC, Croy BA. An analysis of the uterine lymphocyte-derived hybridoma cell line GWM 1-2 for expression of receptors for estrogen, progesterone and interleukin 2. J Reprod Immunol (1996) 31:37–50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Van den Heuvel MJ, Chantakru S, Xumei X, Evans EE, Tekpetey F, Mote PA, Clarke CL, Croy BA. Trafficking of circulating pro-NK cells to the decidualizing uterus: regulatory mechanisms in the mouse and human. Immunol Invest (2005) 34:273–293.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Vanrell JA, Balasch J. Luteal phase defects in repeated abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet (1986) 24:111–115.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Vince GS, Johnson PM. Is there a Th2 bias in human pregnancy? J Reprod Immunol (1996) 32:101–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Walch K, Hefler L, Nagele F. Oral dydrogesterone treatment during the first trimester of pregnancy: the prevention of miscarriage study (PROMIS). A double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med (2005) 18:265–269.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Warburton D, Fraser FC. Spontaneous abortion risks in man: data from reproductive histories collected in a medical genetics unit. Am J Hum Genet (1964) 16:1–25.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Wegmann TG, Hui Lin, Guilbert L, Mosmann TR. Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a Th2 phenomenon? Immunol Today (1993) 14:353–356.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    World Health Organization. Recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand (1977) 56:247–253.[Web of Science][Medline]

    Wilson B, Moor J, Jenkins C, Miller H, Walker JJ, McLean MA, Norman J, McInnes IB. Abnormal first trimester serum interleukin 18 levels are associated with a poor outcome in women with a history of RM. Am J Reprod Immunol (2004) 51:156–159.[Medline]

    Yao MW, Lim H, Schust DJ, Choe SE, Farag A, Ding Y, Michaud S, Church GM, Maas RL. Gene expression profiling reveals progesterone-mediated cell cycle and immunoregulatory roles of Hoxa-10 in the preimplantation uterus. Mol Endocrinol (2003) 17:610–627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Yamamoto T, Takahasi Y, Kase N, Mori H. Role of decidual natural killer (NK) cells in patients with missed abortion: differences between cases with normal and abnormal chromosome. Clin Exp Immunol (1999) 116:449–452.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

    Yie SM, Xiao R, Librach CL. Progesterone regulates HLA-G gene expression through a novel progesterone response element. Hum Reprod (2006) 21:2538–2544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received on July 5, 2007; revised September 14, 2007; accepted on October 10, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/1/27    most recent
dmm035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szekeres-Bartho, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szekeres-Bartho, J.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?