Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on September 18, 2006
Human Reproduction Update 2006 12(6):731-746; doi:10.1093/humupd/dml004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Hospital, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. E-mail: revel{at}md.huji.ac.il
Human embryo implantation is a three-stage process (apposition, adhesion and invasion) involving synchronized crosstalk between a receptive endometrium and a functional blastocyst. This ovarian steroid-dependant phenomenon can only take place during the window of implantation, a self-limited period of endometrial receptivity spanning between days 20 and 24 of the menstrual cycle. Implantation involves a complex sequence of signalling events, consisting in the acquisition of adhesion ligands together with the loss of inhibitory components, which are crucial to the establishment of pregnancy. Histological evaluation, now considered to add little clinically significant information, should be replaced by functional assessment of endometrial receptivity. A large number of molecular mediators have been identified to date, including adhesion molecules, cytokines, growth factors, lipids and others. Thus, endometrial biopsy samples can be used to identify molecules associated with uterine receptivity to obtain a better insight into human implantation. In addition, development of functional in vitro systems to study embryo–uterine interactions will lead to better definition of the interactions existing between the molecules involved in this process. The purpose of this review was not only to describe the different players of the implantation process but also to try to portray the relationship between these factors and their timing in the process of uterine receptivity.
Key words: cell adhesion molecules / cytokines / embryo / endometrial receptivity / implantation
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X. Chen, J. He, Y. Ding, L. Zeng, R. Gao, S. Cheng, X. Liu, and Y. Wang The role of MTOR in mouse uterus during embryo implantation Reproduction, August 1, 2009; 138(2): 351 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Carli, C. N. Metz, Y. Al-Abed, P. H. Naccache, and A. Akoum Up-Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and Prostaglandin E2 Production in Human Endometriotic Cells by Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor: Involvement of Novel Kinase Signaling Pathways Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3128 - 3137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Marwood, K. Visser, L. A. Salamonsen, and E. Dimitriadis Interleukin-11 and Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Regulate the Adhesion of Endometrial Epithelial Cells: Implications in Fertility Regulation Endocrinology, June 1, 2009; 150(6): 2915 - 2923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Nelson and I. A. Greer The potential role of heparin in assisted conception Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 623 - 645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Grewal, J. G. Carver, A. J. Ridley, and H. J. Mardon Implantation of the human embryo requires Rac1-dependent endometrial stromal cell migration PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16189 - 16194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. F. Savaris, A. E. Hamilton, B. A. Lessey, and L. C. Giudice Endometrial Gene Expression in Early Pregnancy: Lessons From Human Ectopic Pregnancy Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2008; 15(8): 797 - 816. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-L. Ma, T. Zhang, J. Meng, Z.-Y. Qin, F. Du, Q.-Y. Wang, and S.-L. Wei The role of T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis inducing protein 1 in early pregnancy in mice Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 14(10): 589 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Wanggren, A. Stavreus-Evers, C. Olsson, E. Andersson, and K. Gemzell-Danielsson Regulation of muscular contractions in the human Fallopian tube through prostaglandins and progestagens Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2359 - 2368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Michael and A. T. Papageorghiou Potential significance of physiological and pharmacological glucocorticoids in early pregnancy Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 497 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Revel, I. Ophir, M. Koler, H. Achache, and D. Prus Changing etiology of tubal pregnancy following IVF Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1372 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Florio, L. Bruni, C. De Falco, G. Filardi, M. Torricelli, F. M. Reis, L. Galleri, C. Voltolini, C. Bocchi, V. De Leo, et al. Evaluation of Endometrial Urocortin Secretion for Prediction of Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination Clin. Chem., February 1, 2008; 54(2): 350 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Feroze-Zaidi, L. Fusi, M. Takano, J. Higham, M. S. Salker, T. Goto, S. Edassery, K. Klingel, K. M. Boini, M. Palmada, et al. Role and Regulation of the Serum- and Glucocorticoid-Regulated Kinase 1 in Fertile and Infertile Human Endometrium Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 5020 - 5029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|