Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on August 1, 2006
Human Reproduction Update 2006 12(6):757-767; doi:10.1093/humupd/dml037
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towards a better understanding of RNA carriage by ejaculate spermatozoa
1 Reproduction and Early Development Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Leeds General Infirmary, Belmont Grove, Leeds, UK and 2 The Jackson Laboratory, Technology Evaluation and Development, Reproductive Technology Resources, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Reproduction and Early Development Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Level D, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. E-mail: d.miller{at}leeds.ac.uk
Research on spermatozoal RNA has made considerable progress since the original reports on its presence appeared in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Through the use of stringent procedures aimed at eliminating contamination artefacts, we now appreciate that a complex cohort of mRNAs persists in the ejaculate cell but that 80S (cytoplasmic) ribosomal complexes are not present in sufficient quantities to support cytoplasmic mRNA translation. Despite this, under certain conditions, at least some cytoplasmic mRNAs can apparently be translated de novo, possibly on mitochondrial polysomes. The detection of mRNA translation by mature spermatozoa essentially supports the earliest research reports on spermatozoal gene expression although the suggested relationship with protein turnover and capacitation is wholly unexpected. We also examine some alternative explanations and roles for RNA carriage, including the RNAs passive retention as a consequence of nuclear shutdown and a more active role in chromatin repackaging, genomic imprinting, gene silencing and post-fertilization requirements of essential paternal RNAs. The recent report of an RNA-mediated epigenetic alteration to phenotype that is likely to be sperm derived is of particular interest in this regard. We finally show that regardless of the biological role(s) of spermatozoal RNA, its utility in infertility studies, particularly when coupled with modern techniques in gene-expression analysis (e.g. microarrays), is obvious. As a wholly non-invasive proxy for the testis, this RNA offers considerable potential as a marker for fertility status and the genetic and environmental influences that could make all the difference between a fertile and an infertile phenotype.
Key words: fertilization / gene expression / imprinting / spermatozoal chromatin / spermatozoal RNA
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C.G. Ravina, M. Seda, F.M. Pinto, A. Orea, M. Fernandez-Sanchez, C.O. Pintado, and M.L. Candenas A role for tachykinins in the regulation of human sperm motility Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1617 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-G. Li, X.-F. Ding, A.-H. Liao, X.-B. Kong, and C.-L. Xiong Expression of CatSper family transcripts in the mouse testis during post-natal development and human ejaculated spermatozoa: relationship to sperm motility Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 13(5): 299 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Rissone, M. Monopoli, M. Beltrame, F. Bussolino, F. Cotelli, and M. Arese Comparative Genome Analysis of the Neurexin Gene Family in Danio rerio: Insights into Their Functions and Evolution Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 236 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|