Skip Navigation


Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on September 7, 2006
Human Reproduction Update 2007 13(1):15-25; doi:10.1093/humupd/dml043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/1/15    most recent
dml043v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donoso, P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donoso, P.
Right arrow Articles by Devroey, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF

P. Donoso1,4, C. Staessen1,2, B.C.J.M. Fauser3 and P. Devroey1

1 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, 2 Centre for Medical Genetics, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Brussels, Belgium and 3 Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: pdonoso{at}alemana.cl


   Abstract

Preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening (PGS) has been performed during the last decade as a way of enhancing embryo selection in patients with an increased incidence of embryonic numerical chromosome abnormalities (advanced maternal age, recurrent miscarriage and recurrent implantation failure). It has been proposed that the replacement of euploid embryos in these patients would result in a higher implantation and pregnancy rate and a reduced miscarriage rate. Additionally, the transfer of fewer embryos could reduce the chances for multiple pregnancies in all IVF patients. Although, to date, multiple studies have addressed this issue, contradictory results have been encountered. As a result, the effectiveness of aneuploidy screening remains to be established. Moreover, child outcome studies documenting the safety of this procedure are needed. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence concerning the use of PGS to determine the current value of the technique.

Key words: aneuploidy screening / embryo selection / preimplantation genetic diagnosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Liebaers, S. Desmyttere, W. Verpoest, M. De Rycke, C. Staessen, K. Sermon, P. Devroey, P. Haentjens, and M. Bonduelle
Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Hum. Reprod., August 27, 2009; (2009) dep298v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey
Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. C.J.M. Fauser
Preimplantation genetic screening: the end of an affair?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2622 - 2625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
C. M. Ogilvie
Preimplantation testing for chromosome aneuploidy
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), April 1, 2008; 10(2): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. M.H. Combelles
What are the trade-offs between one-cell and two-cell biopsies of preimplantation embryos?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 493 - 498.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Braude and F. Flinter
Use and misuse of preimplantation genetic testing
BMJ, October 13, 2007; 335(7623): 752 - 754.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Mantzouratou, A. Mania, E. Fragouli, L. Xanthopoulou, S. Tashkandi, K. Fordham, D.M. Ranieri, A. Doshi, S. Nuttall, J.C. Harper, et al.
Variable aneuploidy mechanisms in embryos from couples with poor reproductive histories undergoing preimplantation genetic screening
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1844 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.