Skip Navigation


Human Reproduction Update Advance Access originally published online on October 22, 2008
Human Reproduction Update 2009 15(1):139-151; doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/1/139    most recent
dmn047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wright, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Caroline F. Wright1 and Hilary Burton

PHG Foundation Strangeways Research Laboratory, 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK

1 Correspondence address. Tel: +44-1223-740200; Fax: +44-1223-740892; E-mail: caroline.wright{at}phgfoundation.org

BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal nucleic acids (cffNA) can be detected in the maternal circulation during pregnancy, potentially offering an excellent method for early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of the genetic status of a fetus. Using molecular techniques, fetal DNA and RNA can be detected from 5 weeks gestation and are rapidly cleared from the circulation following birth.

METHODS: We searched PubMed systematically using keywords free fetal DNA and NIPD. Reference lists from relevant papers were also searched to ensure comprehensive coverage of the area.

RESULTS: Cell-free fetal DNA comprises only 3–6% of the total circulating cell-free DNA, therefore diagnoses are primarily limited to those caused by paternally inherited sequences as well as conditions that can be inferred by the unique gene expression patterns in the fetus and placenta. Broadly, the potential applications of this technology fall into two categories: first, high genetic risk families with inheritable monogenic diseases, including sex determination in cases at risk of X-linked diseases and detection of specific paternally inherited single gene disorders; and second, routine antenatal care offered to all pregnant women, including prenatal screening/diagnosis for aneuploidy, particularly Down syndrome (DS), and diagnosis of Rhesus factor status in RhD negative women. Already sex determination and Rhesus factor diagnosis are nearing translation into clinical practice for high-risk individuals.

CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of cffNA may allow NIPD for a variety of genetic conditions and may in future form part of national antenatal screening programmes for DS and other common genetic disorders.

Key words: cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) / non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) / cell-free fetal nucleic acids / prenatal diagnosis / genetic diagnosis

Received on June 26, 2008; revised September 15, 2008; accepted on September 25, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Huang, H. Li, X. Ding, and C. Xiong
Presence and Characterization of Cell-Free Seminal RNA in Healthy Individuals: Implications for Noninvasive Disease Diagnosis and Gene Expression Studies of the Male Reproductive System
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2009; 55(11): 1967 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. F Wright and L. S Chitty
Cell-free fetal DNA and RNA in maternal blood: implications for safer antenatal testing
BMJ, July 6, 2009; 339(jul06_2): b2451 - b2451.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.