Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saith, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sargent, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saith, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sargent, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.4, No.2 pp.121-134, 1998
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 1998; all rights reserved

Relationships between the developmental potential of human in-vitro fertilization embryos and features describing the embryo, oocyte and follicle

RR Saith0,1, A Srinivasan2, D Michie2,3 and IL Sargent0

0 Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK 2 Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK 3 Present address: 6 Inveralmond Grove, Edinburgh EH4 6RA, UK 1 Corresponding author

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship of features of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos and the associated oocyte and follicle to the outcome of transfer. It differs from previous studies in including a range of features (n=53) and in using class probability tree analysis. This is a non-parametric multivariate method which expresses relationships as simple rules of features characterizing the 'take home baby' and 'no take home baby' (negative pregnancy test) classes of embryo batches. Data were analysed retrospectively. Fifty-three (embryo, oocyte and follicular) features for each of the three embryos in the transferred batch were collected for 200 IVF patients. Each batch of three embryos was described by a representative value for each feature. The relationship between features and outcome of transfer was analysed. Only four of the 53 features were identified as predictive. However, an appropriate combination of these four (embryo grade, cell number, follicle size and follicular fluid volume) achieved satisfactory predictivities while offering a simplified and more quantitative basis than regularly used criteria. The key component of the composite embryo grading allotted by embryologists turned out to be cell number. The existing predictive use of follicular size was corroborated and an independent additional predictive contribution of follicular fluid volume was found. The study also suggests that the 49 remaining features have little additional predictive value.

Keywords:embryo quality/follicle/IVF/oocyte/outcome prediction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Gooding, D. Barber, S.H. Kennedy, and J.A. Noble
Measurement of the speed of sound in follicular fluid
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 497 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. N. Desai, J. Goldstein, D. Y. Rowland, and J. M. Goldfarb
Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2000; 15(10): 2190 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.P. Lau, W.L. Ledger, N.P. Groome, D.H. Barlow, and S. Muttukrishna
Dimeric inhibins and activin A in human follicular fluid and oocyte-cumulus culture medium
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2525 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.