Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sermon, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sermon, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction Update, Vol.8, No.1 pp.11-20, 2002
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2002; all rights reserved

Current concepts in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): a molecular biologist’s view

Karen Sermon1

1 Centre for Medical Genetics, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Karen Sermon, Centre for Medical Genetics, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. . e-mail: lgensnk{at}az.vub.ac.be

Abstract

The first clinically applied preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was reported more than a decade ago and since then PGD has known an exponential growth. This first report described the use of PCR to sex embryos from couples at risk for X-linked diseases. Not surprisingly, in the first years, the development of PCR-based tests led to PGD for well-known monogenic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and thalassaemia. When fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) was introduced it quickly replaced PCR-based methods, which had led to misdiagnoses, for sexing of embryos. FISH was also quickly introduced for aneuploidy screening, which has as its main aim the improvement of IVF results in patients with poor reproductive outcome, and later for PGD in translocation carriers. In this review, PGD for patients with a pre-existing genetic risk will be discussed, i.e. the monogenic diseases and the translocations, as well as different biopsy methods and promising new developments.

Key words: embryo biopsy / PGD for chromosomal translocations / preimplantation genetic diagnosis / sexing of embryos / single-cell PCR


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Verpoest, P. Haentjens, M. De Rycke, C. Staessen, K. Sermon, M. Bonduelle, P. Devroey, and I. Liebaers
Cumulative reproductive outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a report on 1498 couples
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2951 - 2959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Verpoest, L. Van Landuyt, S. Desmyttere, A. Cremers, P. Devroey, and I. Liebaers
The incidence of monozygotic twinning following PGD is not increased
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2009; 24(11): 2945 - 2950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Rice, K. Ojha, S. Whitehead, and H. Mason
Stage-Specific Expression of Androgen Receptor, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor, and Anti-Mullerian Hormone Type II Receptor in Single, Isolated, Human Preantral Follicles: Relevance to Polycystic Ovaries
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 1034 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Mertes, G. Pennings, and A. Van Steirteghem
An ethical analysis of alternative methods to obtain pluripotent stem cells without destroying embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2749 - 2755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. Meiner, N. Weinberg, A. Safran, L. Israela, M. Sagi, H. Rosenmann, E. Aizenman, D. Abeliovich, N. Laufer, and A. Simon
Preimplantation exclusion of embryos at risk for prion diseases
Neurology, February 28, 2006; 66(4): 607 - 608.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
R. E. Amir, V. R. Sutton, and I. B. Van den Veyver
Newborn Screening and Prenatal Diagnosis for Rett Syndrome: Implications for Therapy
J Child Neurol, September 1, 2005; 20(9): 779 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
R. E. Amir, V. Reid Sutton, and I. B. Van den Veyver
Newborn Screening and Prenatal Diagnosis for Rett Syndrome: Implications for Therapy
J Child Neurol, August 1, 2005; 20(8): 779 - 783.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
C. M. Ogilvie, P. R. Braude, and P. N. Scriven
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis--An Overview
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.R. Thornhill, C.E. deDie-Smulders, J.P. Geraedts, J.C. Harper, G.L. Harton, S.A. Lavery, C. Moutou, M.D. Robinson, A.G. Schmutzler, P.N. Scriven, et al.
ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 35 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Anton, J. Blanco, J. Egozcue, and F. Vidal
Sperm FISH studies in seven male carriers of Robertsonian translocation t(13;14)(q10;q10)
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1345 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. De Vos, K. Sermon, M. De Rijcke, V. Goossens, P. Henderix, N. Van Ranst, P. Platteau, W. Lissens, P. Devroey, A. Van Steirteghem, et al.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Jericho, L. Wilton, D. A. Gook, and D. H. Edgar
A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 568 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.