Human Reproduction Update, Vol.8, No.2 pp.129-139, 2002
© European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2002; all rights reserved
Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature
1 Section of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
To whom correspondence should be addressed at: M. J. Heineman, Section of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands. e-mail: M.J.Heineman{at}og.azg.nl
Abstract
Since the introduction of IVF treatments, natural cycle IVF has been largely replaced by IVF with ovarian stimulation. However, natural cycle IVF has several advantages. It is associated with a close to zero multiple pregnancy rate, and a zero risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Per cycle, natural cycle IVF is less time consuming, physically and emotionally less demanding for patients, and cheaper than stimulated IVF, but also less effective. This systematic literature review addresses the issue of effectiveness of natural cycle IVF. Herein, 20 studies describing natural cycle IVF are presented; 12 case series and eight in which a comparison was made between natural cycle IVF and IVF with ovarian stimulation. Good-quality randomized controlled trials and formal cost-effectiveness analyses are lacking. The 20 selected studies comprised a total of 1800 cycles of natural cycle IVF, resulting in 819 embryo transfers (45.5% per cycle) and 129 ongoing pregnancies (7.2% per cycle and 15.8% per embryo transfer). Efficacy of natural cycle IVF is hampered by high cancellation rates because of premature LH rise and premature ovulations. It is concluded that natural cycle IVF is a low-risk, low-cost and patient-friendly procedure. A randomized controlled trial comparing natural cycle IVF with current standard treatment strategies is warranted.
Key words: IVF / natural cycle / spontaneous cycle / systematic literature review / unstimulated cycle
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I. W.H. van Empel, W. L.D.M. Nelen, R. P.M.G. Hermens, and J. A.M. Kremer Coming soon to your clinic: high-quality ART Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1242 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Nargund, B.C.J.M. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, W. Ombelet, K. Nygren, R. Frydman, and for the Rotterdam ISMAAR Consensus Group on Termin The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2801 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, and R. Fleming Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2414 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, A. Hoek, A.H.M. Simons, E.G.J.M. Arts, M.H. Mochtar, S. Beemsterboer, M.N. Hondelink, and M.J. Heineman Cumulative pregnancy rates after three cycles of minimal stimulation IVF and results according to subfertility diagnosis: a multicentre cohort study Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2375 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Y. Ng, F. Naveed, E. Y. L. Lau, W. S. B. Yeung, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, and P. C. Ho A randomized double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching on implantation and pregnancy rates of frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the cleavage stage Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 979 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Iwase, H. Ando, K. Kuno, and S. Mizutani Use of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Test to Predict Poor Response in In Vitro Fertilization Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2005; 105(3): 645 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, A. Hoek, E.G.J.M. Arts, A.H.M. Simons, and M.J. Heineman Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH: a pilot study Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 642 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Inge, P. R. Brinsden, and K. T. Elder Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.G.M. Lukassen, D. D.Braat, A. M.M. Wetzels, G. A. Zielhuis, E. M.M. Adang, E. Scheenjes, and J. A.M. Kremer Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 702 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Klonoff-Cohen Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: what is known and unknown Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 180 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. UBALDI, L. RIENZI, S. FERRERO, E. BARONI, M. IACOBELLI, F. SAPIENZA, M. G. MINASI, L. COBELLIS, S. ROMANO, F. SCARSELLI, et al. Natural In Vitro Fertilization Cycles Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1034(1): 245 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Modified natural cycle for IVF does not offer a realistic chance of parenthood in poor responders with high day 3 FSH levels, as a last resort prior to oocyte donation Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2545 - 2549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Y. Ng, C. C. W. Chan, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2385 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. E. Messinis and E. Domali What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1933 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bellver, E. Escudero, and A. Pellicer Bilateral partial oophorectomy in the management of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): Ovarian mutilating surgery is not an option in the management of severe OHSS Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1363 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|