Skip Navigation


Human Reproduction Update Advance Access first published online on March 15, 2006
This version published online on March 28, 2006

Human Reproduction Update, doi:10.1093/humupd/dmk005
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/3/233    most recent
dmk005v2
dmk005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van den Veyver, I.B.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Hussaini, T.K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van den Veyver, I.B.
Right arrow Articles by Al-Hussaini, T.K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received August 18, 2005
Revised December 3, 2005
Accepted January 3, 2006

Article

Biparental hydatidiform moles: a maternal effect mutation affecting imprinting in the offspring

I.B. Van den Veyver 1 * and T.K. Al-Hussaini 2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
I.B. Van den Veyver, E-mail: iveyver{at}bcm.tmc.edu


   Abstract

Highly recurrent hydatidiform moles (HMs) studied to date are not androgenetic but have biparental genomic contribution (BiHM). Affected women have an autosomal recessive mutation that causes their pregnancies to develop into HM. Although there is genetic heterogeneity, a major locus maps to chromosome 19q13.42, but a mutated gene has not yet been identified. Molecular studies have shown that maternal imprinting marks are deregulated in the BiHM trophoblast. The mutations that cause this condition are, therefore, hypothesized to occur in genes that encode transacting factors required for the establishment of imprinting marks in the maternal germline or for their maintenance in the embryo. Although only DNA methylation marks at imprinted loci have been studied in the BiHM, the mutation may affect genes that are essential for other forms of chromatin remodelling at imprinted loci and necessary for correct maternal allele-specific DNA methylation and imprinted gene expression. Normal pregnancies interspersed with BiHM have been reported in some of the pedigrees, but affected women repeatedly attempting pregnancy should be counselled about the risk for invasive trophoblastic disease with each subsequent BiHM.

Keywords: embryology/genetic disorders/germ cells/imprinting/pregnancy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
K. M. Murphy, T. G. McConnell, M. J. Hafez, R. Vang, and B. M. Ronnett
Molecular Genotyping of Hydatidiform Moles: Analytic Validation of a Multiplex Short Tandem Repeat Assay
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2009; 11(6): 598 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
Y.C. Kou, L. Shao, H.H. Peng, R. Rosetta, D. del Gaudio, A.F. Wagner, T.K. Al-Hussaini, and I.B. Van den Veyver
A recurrent intragenic genomic duplication, other novel mutations in NLRP7 and imprinting defects in recurrent biparental hydatidiform moles
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 33 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.