Human Reproduction Update Advance Access first published online on November 16, 2007
This version published online on November 30, 2007
Human Reproduction Update, doi:10.1093/humupd/dmm036
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dizygotic twinning
1 Department of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology Laboratories, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia 3 Division of Reproductive Medicine, VU University Amsterdam, Medical Centre (VUMC), 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
To whom correspondence should be addressed at: 4 Correspondence address. Tel: +31-20-5988792; Fax: +31-20-5988832; E-mail: c.hoekstra{at}psy.vu.nl
The tendency to conceive spontaneous dizygotic (DZ) twins is a complex trait with important contributions from both environmental factors and genetic disposition. Twins are relatively common and occur on average 13 times per 1000 maternities, though the twinning frequency varies over time and geographic location. This variation is mostly attributed to the differences in DZ twinning rate, since the monozygotic twinning rate is relatively constant. DZ twinning is in part under genetic control, with mothers of DZ twins reporting significantly more female family members with DZ twins than mothers of monozygotic twins. Maternal factors such as genetic history, advanced age and increased parity are known to increase the risk of DZ twins. Recent research confirmed that taller mothers and mothers with a high body mass index (30>) are at greater risk of DZ twinning. Seasonality, smoking, oral contraceptive use and folic acid show less convincing associations with twinning. Genetic analysis is beginning to identify genes contributing to the variation in twinning. Mutations in one of these genes (growth differentiation factor 9) are significantly more frequent in mothers of DZ twins. However, the mutations are rare and only account for a small part of the genetic contribution for twinning.
Key words: twinning frequency / dizygotic twinning / GDF9 / genetic factors / environmental factors
The third keyword has been changed from GDP9 to GDF9
Received on August 14, 2007; revised September 7, 2007; accepted on October 12, 2007
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Schieve, O. Devine, C. A. Boyle, J. R. Petrini, and L. Warner Estimation of the Contribution of Non-Assisted Reproductive Technology Ovulation Stimulation Fertility Treatments to US Singleton and Multiple Births Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2009; 170(11): 1396 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Jordan, A. C. Green, C. M. Nagle, C. M. Olsen, D. C. Whiteman, P. M. Webb, and for the Australian Cancer Study (Ovarian Cancer) a Beyond Parity: Association of Ovarian Cancer With Length of Gestation and Offspring Characteristics Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2009; 170(5): 607 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Boklage Traces of embryogenesis are the same in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: not compatible with double ovulation Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1255 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kaeuffer, D. Reale, D. Pontier, J.-L. Chapuis, and D. W Coltman Local effects of inbreeding on embryo number and consequences for genetic diversity in Kerguelen mouflon Biol Lett, October 23, 2008; 4(5): 504 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Helle Why twin pregnancies are more successful at advanced than young maternal age? A potential role of 'terminal reproductive investment' Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2387 - 2389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.J. Lambers, S. Roek, L. Luttikhof, R. Schats, R. Homburg, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk A family history of twinning in relation to multiple implantation Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 889 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



