<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Human Reproduction Update - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Human Reproduction Update - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2369</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Human Reproduction Update</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1355-4786</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp026v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp021v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp022v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp020v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp019v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp018v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp014v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp017v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp004v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp025v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of micronutrients in the periconceptional period]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp025v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Micronutrient deficiencies have been associated with significantly high reproductive risks, ranging from infertility to fetal structural defects and long-term diseases. In this review we focus on the reproductive risks related to some micronutrients during the periconceptional period, a critical step in determining fetal development and health due to the potential onset of several disorders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>Embase Medline and PubMed databases, Google-indexed scientific literature and periodics from on-line University of Milan Bibliotecary Service were searched to identify relevant publications. <I>In vivo</I> human studies were mainly searched for, but when needed animal studies as well as <I>in vitro</I> and cell culture experiments were also considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Fertility, conception, implantation, fetal organogenesis and placentation are the critical stages potentially affected by nutrition during the periconceptional period. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and total homocysteine (tHcy) plasma levels are factors involved in the respective mechanisms. The preconceptional period is particularly important since it affects both fertility and the early stages of gestation. Micronutrients' dietary intake and maternal status affect the different phases of the onset and development of pregnancy as well as of the conceptus.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSION</st>
<p>Although human studies are scarce, and conclusive evidence is provided solely for periconceptional folate and prevention of neural tube defects (NTDs), the overall data indicate that micronutrients may affects fertility, embryogenesis and placentation, and the prophylactic use of some micronutrients may be useful in preventing several adverse pregnancy outcomes. Efforts to increase awareness of a healthy diet should be strengthened not only throughout pregnancy but also before. However, further researches in humans are necessary to optimise periconceptional micronutrient requirements.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cetin, I., Berti, C., Calabrese, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp025</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of micronutrients in the periconceptional period]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp024v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Visually scoring hirsutism]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp024v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Hirsutism is the presence of excess body or facial terminal (coarse) hair growth in females in a male-like pattern, affects 5&ndash;15% of women, and is an important sign of underlying androgen excess. Different methods are available for the assessment of hair growth in women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>We conducted a literature search and analyzed the published studies that reported methods for the assessment of hair growth. We review the basic physiology of hair growth, the development of methods for visually quantifying hair growth, the comparison of these methods with objective measurements of hair growth, how hirsutism may be defined using a visual scoring method, the influence of race and ethnicity on hirsutism, and the impact of hirsutism in diagnosing androgen excess and polycystic ovary syndrome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Objective methods for the assessment of hair growth including photographic evaluations and microscopic measurements are available but these techniques have limitations for clinical use, including a significant degree of complexity and a high cost. Alternatively, methods for visually scoring or quantifying the amount of terminal body and facial hair growth have been in use since the early 1920s; these methods are semi-quantitative at best and subject to significant inter-observer variability. The most common visual method of scoring the extent of body and facial terminal hair growth in use today is based on a modification of the method originally described by Ferriman and Gallwey in 1961 (i.e. the mFG method).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSION</st>
<p>Overall, the mFG scoring method is a useful visual instrument for assessing excess terminal hair growth, and the presence of hirsutism, in women.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yildiz, B. O., Bolour, S., Woods, K., Moore, A., Azziz, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Visually scoring hirsutism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp026v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp026v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Whether the addition of growth hormone (GH) can improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been examined to date by several underpowered studies, which have not provided solid conclusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>A computerized literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and randomized controlled trial (RCT) registries was performed independently by two reviewers, aiming to identify RCTs that evaluated the following research question: does GH addition increase the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Six relevant RCTs were identified, including a total of 169 patients. GH addition significantly increased clinical pregnancy (rate difference: +16%, 95% CI: +4 to +28; fixed effects model) (number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 6, 95% CI: 4&ndash;25) and live birth rates (rate difference: +17%, 95% CI: +5 to +30; fixed effects model) (NNT = 6; 95% CI: 3&ndash;20). Furthermore, GH addition was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients reaching embryo transfer (rate difference: +22%, 95% CI: +7 to +36; fixed effects model).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>The present meta-analysis provides evidence that GH addition increases the probability of clinical pregnancy and live birth in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues and gonadotrophins for IVF. However, the total number of patients analyzed is small and thus further RCTs are warranted to prove or disprove this finding.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kolibianakis, E.M., Venetis, C.A., Diedrich, K., Tarlatzis, B.C., Griesinger, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Addition of growth hormone to gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation of poor responders treated by in-vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Male infertility and the involvement of the X chromosome]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Male infertility is a worldwide problem, keeping many researchers puzzled. Besides environmental factors, much attention is paid to single gene defects. In this view, the sex chromosomes are particularly interesting since men only have a single copy of these chromosomes. The involvement of the Y chromosome in male infertility is obvious since the detection of Yq microdeletions. The role of the X chromosome, however, remains less understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>Articles were obtained by searching PubMed until December 2008. A first search attempted to identify genes located on the X chromosome potentially important for spermatogenesis. A second part of the study was focused on those genes for which the role has already been studied in infertile patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Multiple genes located on the X chromosome are expressed in testicular tissues. The function of many genes, especially the cancer&ndash;testis genes, has not been studied so far. There were striking differences between mouse and human genes. In the second part of the study, the results of mutation analyses of seven genes (AR, SOX3, USP26, NXF2, TAF7L, FATE and AKAP4) are described. Except for AR, no infertility causing mutations have, thus far, been described. It cannot be excluded that some of the observed changes should be considered as risk factors for impaired spermatogenesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>It can be concluded that, so far, the mutation analysis of X-linked genes in humans, presumed to be crucial for spermatogenesis or sperm quality, has been disappointing. Other approaches to learn more about male infertility are necessary.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stouffs, K., Tournaye, H., Liebaers, I., Lissens, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Male infertility and the involvement of the X chromosome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp021v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Orthotopic and heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp021v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Transplantation of ovarian tissue is, at present, the only clinical option available to restore fertility using cryopreserved ovarian tissue. More than 30 transplantations of cryopreserved tissue have been reported, and six babies have been born, worldwide, following this procedure. Despite these encouraging results, it is essential to optimize the procedure by improving the follicular survival, confirming safety and developing alternatives. Here, we review the different factors affecting follicular survival and growth after grafting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>Relevant studies were identified by searching Pubmed up to January 2009 with English language limitation. The following key words were used: (ovarian tissue or whole ovary) AND (transplantation) AND (cryopreservation or pregnancy). Using the literature and personal experience, we examined relevant data on the different exogenous and clinical factors affecting follicular development after grafting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Clinical factors such as the patient's age and the transplantation sites influenced the lifespan of the graft. A heterotopic transplantation site is not optimal but offers some advantages and it may also promote the hormonal environment after a combined heterotopic and orthotopic transplantation. Exogenous factors such as antioxidants, growth factors or hormones were tested to improve follicular survival; however, their efficiency regarding further follicular development and fertility potential remains to be established.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSION</st>
<p>Additional evidence is required to define optimal conditions for ovarian tissue transplantation. Alternatives such as whole ovary or isolated follicles transplantations require further investigation but are likely to be successful in humans in the future.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demeestere, I., Simon, P., Emiliani, S., Delbaere, A., Englert, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Orthotopic and heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp022v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hormone therapy and cognitive function]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp022v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Clinical trials yield discrepant information about the impact of hormone therapy on verbal memory and executive function. This issue is clinically relevant because declines in verbal memory are the earliest predictor of Alzheimer's disease and declines in executive function are central to some theories of normal, age-related changes in cognition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials of hormone therapy (i.e. oral, transdermal, i.m.) and verbal memory, distinguishing studies in younger (i.e. &le;65 years of age; <I>n</I> = 9) versus older (i.e. &gt;65 years; <I>n</I> = 7) women and studies involving estrogen alone versus estrogen plus progestogen. Out of 32 placebo-controlled trials, 17 were included (13 had no verbal memory measures and 2 involved cholinergic manipulations). We also provide a narrative review of 25 studies of executive function (two trials), since there are insufficient clinical trial data for systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>There is some evidence for a beneficial effect of estrogen alone on verbal memory in younger naturally post-menopausal women and more consistent evidence from small-n studies of surgically post-menopausal women. There is stronger evidence of a detrimental effect of conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on verbal memory in younger and older post-menopausal women. Observational studies and pharmacological models of menopause provide initial evidence of improvements in executive function with hormone therapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>Future studies should include measures of executive function and should address pressing clinical questions; including what formulation of combination hormone therapy is cognitively neutral/beneficial, yet effective in treating hot flashes in the early post-menopause.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maki, P. M., Sundermann, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hormone therapy and cognitive function]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp020v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Female contraception over 40]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp020v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>The majority of women 40&ndash;49 years of age need an effective method of contraception because the decline in fertility with age is an insufficient protection against unwanted pregnancy. Although pregnancy is less likely after the age of 40 years, the clinical and social consequences of an unexpected pregnancy are potentially detrimental. No contraceptive method is contraindicated by advanced reproductive age alone; thus there is a need to discuss the effectiveness, risks and non-contraceptive benefits of all family planning methods for women in this age group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>MEDLINE searches were done by topic (epidemiology, age and reproduction, sexual function, delayed childbearing and specific contraceptive methods). The topic summaries were presented to the Workshop Group and omissions or disagreements were resolved by discussion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>The decline in fecundity in the fifth decade is insufficient for contraceptive purposes. Thus a family planning method is needed. Sterilization is by far the most common method in several countries. Copper intrauterine devices and hormone intrauterine systems have similar effectiveness, with fewer than 1% failures in the first year of typical use. Special considerations in this age group include the frequency of menstrual irregularity, sexual problems and the possibility of menopausal symptoms, all of which may respond to hormonal methods of contraception.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>Women should be advised to continue with a contraceptive method until they have reached the menopause with its natural state of sterility.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Female contraception over 40]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp019v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Monozygotic twinning, cerebral palsy and congenital anomalies]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp019v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>The majority of cases of cerebral palsy (CP) have their pathogenesis during fetal development and are a form of congenital anomaly, the aetiology of which is uncertain. Anomalous development of other organs evident at birth is also a congenital anomaly. A small proportion of these are known to be caused by chromosomal or gene abnormalities, environmental tetratogens and dietary deficiencies. The majority are of unknown aetiology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>A review of monochorionic (MC) monozygotic (MZ) placentation in the pathogenesis of congenital anomalies and CP was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Zygote division and MC placentation have serious implications for the development of both conceptuses. Most reports observe predominantly cerebral abnormalities in one or both conceptuses. These cerebral abnormalities often present as CP or other disabilities attributable to central nervous system impairment. In addition to the anomalies in central nervous system development, anomalies in the fetal development of a wide variety of other organs have been reported with MC MZ twinning.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>CP and congenital anomalies share a common pathogenic mechanism attributable to MZ twinning. These abnormalities in singletons are coincident with very early loss of one conceptus. The quantitative contribution of monozygosity and monochorionicity to the genesis of CP and congenital anomalies needs to be made.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pharoah, P.O.D., Dundar, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Monozygotic twinning, cerebral palsy and congenital anomalies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp018v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp018v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>The social and psychological factors determining intentions to donate gametes are important for clinics, policy-makers and recruitment campaigns. The aims of this systematic review were therefore to integrate the research findings regarding the psychosocial determinants of oocyte donation and extrapolate women's experiences of donation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>A bibliographic search of English language publications of four computerized databases was undertaken with no time restriction set for publications.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>A total of 64 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The research syntheses revealed there were distinct differences between patient and non-patient (known, commercial, volunteer and potential) donors on demographic characteristics, motives for donation, and issues relating to disclosure and attitudes towards the resultant offspring. Further, studies have found that a significant proportion of oocyte donors and women from the general population were prepared to donate their oocytes as identifiable donors. Studies which have examined the experiences of donors report positive experiences of oocyte donation. However, a number of methodological limitations relating to the oocyte donation research literature have been identified in this systematic review.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSION</st>
<p>Differences between donor groups on a range of factors highlight the need for tailored psychosocial evaluation and counselling. The review has demonstrated that it is not useful to generalize across donor groups on various factors relating to oocyte donation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purewal, S., van den Akker, O.B.A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-14</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Prediction models have been developed in reproductive medicine to help assess the chances of a treatment-(in)dependent pregnancy. Careful evaluation is needed before these models can be implemented in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>We systematically searched the literature for papers reporting prediction models in reproductive medicine for three strategies: expectant management, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or <I>in vitro</I> fertilization (IVF). We evaluated which phases of development these models had passed, distinguishing between (i) model derivation, (ii) internal and/or external validation, and (iii) impact analysis. We summarized their performance at external validation in terms of discrimination and calibration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>We identified 36 papers reporting on 29 prediction models. There were 9 models for the prediction of treatment-independent pregnancy, 3 for the prediction of pregnancy after IUI and 17 for the prediction of pregnancy after IVF. All of the models had completed the phase of model derivation. For six models, the validity of the model was assessed only in the population in which it was developed (internal validation). For eight models, the validity was assessed in populations other than the one in which the model was developed (external validation), and only three of these showed good performance. One model had reached the phase of impact analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>Currently, there are three models with good predictive performance. These models can be used reliably as a guide for making decisions about fertility treatment, in patients similar to the development population. The effects of using these models in patient care have to be further investigated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leushuis, E., van der Steeg, J. W., Steures, P., Bossuyt, P. M.M., Eijkemans, M. J.C., van der Veen, F., Mol, B. W.J., Hompes, P. G.A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>With advances in treatment, the number of young cancer survivors who may benefit from fertility preservation is growing. The aim of this study was to review the literature investigating psychological aspects of fertility issues and fertility preservation in patients undergoing fertility-compromising therapy for cancer or other life-threatening diseases, previous to or during their reproductive lifespan.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>Articles were identified in PubMed, Embase and PsycLIT as well as manually retrieved from literature citations for the time period from 1999 to 2008. Inclusion criteria were (i) qualitative or quantitative design, (ii) focus on patients previous to or during their reproductive lifespan and (iii) dealing with aspects such as (1) impact of fertility issues in cancer patients or (2) health professionals' and/or patients' attitudes towards fertility preservation or (3) counselling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Twenty-four studies were identified. According to the studies on aspect (1), fertility is an important issue for cancer patients. Health professionals as well as patients and parents consider fertility preservation as an important option for young cancer patients; all parties involved, however, were noted to have knowledge and information deficits. Patients recalling counselling about the impact of cancer treatment on fertility ranged from 34% to 72%. Counselling is far from being offered globally to all patients at risk, and providing information seems to be selective.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>The existing literature demonstrates the need for and the limits of current counselling. Future research should target the means to facilitate the decision-making process for patients and health professionals.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tschudin, S., Bitzer, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp014v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp014v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>In humans, normal healthy children are regularly produced through fertilization of fresh oocytes with fresh spermatozoa. However, asynchrony between oocytes and spermatozoa, especially when aged oocytes are fertilized by fresh or senescent spermatozoa, will not only affect the rate of fertilization and pre- and post-implantation embryo development but also the life of the offspring. As many failures in assisted reproduction technologies (ART) are related to oocyte aging, new methods are needed to control oocyte aging to benefit modern ART.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>We review changes associated with decreased fertilization rates and developmental potential of aged oocytes, and we present methods and approaches that prevent or delay oocyte aging.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Cellular and molecular abnormalities occur during oocyte aging, but prevention, delay or reversal is possible to various extents. Modifying existing culture conditions, or treatment of oocytes with agents such as caffeine, DL-dithiothreitol, nitric oxide or trichostatin A may correct molecular pathways that are affected by aging, and thus benefit and improve success rates in modern ART.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>Aging of oocytes is characterized by a sequence of molecular processes that deteriorate during aging and negatively impact fertilization and development. However, oocyte aging can be delayed or reversed by various treatments to increase success rates and produce increased numbers of healthy embryos, preventing failures or abnormalities that are frequently associated with ART using aged oocytes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miao, Y.-L., Kikuchi, K., Sun, Q.-Y., Schatten, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp017v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp017v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Various studies have reported an inverse relation between oral contraceptive (OC) use and the risk of colorectal cancer, but the issue is still open.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>In order to quantify the association between OC use and colorectal cancer risk, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on this issue. We identified all relevant studies published, in English, as original articles up to December 2008 through a search of the literature using PubMed and EMBASE, and by reviewing the references from the retrieved articles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>The summary relative risk of colorectal cancer for ever versus never OC use was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.69&ndash;0.97) from 11 case&ndash;control studies, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75&ndash;0.89) from seven cohort studies, and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72&ndash;0.92) from all studies combined. The results were similar for colon and rectal cancer. No difference was evident according to duration of OC use both for colon and rectal cancer, although there is an indication that the protection is stronger for more recent use (OR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53&ndash;0.90, on the basis of four studies).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSION</st>
<p>Epidemiological data consistently indicate that OC users have a reduced risk of colorectal cancer, and that the protection is greater for recent use in the absence, however, of a duration&ndash;risk relation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bosetti, C., Bravi, F., Negri, E., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Mitochondria are multitasking organelles involved in ATP synthesis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, calcium signalling and apoptosis; and mitochondrial defects are known to cause physiological dysfunction, including infertility. The goal of this review was to identify and discuss common themes in mitochondrial function related to mammalian reproduction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>The scientific literature was searched for studies reporting on the several aspects of mitochondrial activity in mammalian testis, sperm, oocytes, early embryos and embryonic stem cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>ATP synthesis and ROS production are the most discussed aspects of mitochondrial function. Metabolic shifts from mitochondria-produced ATP to glycolysis occur at several stages, notably during gametogenesis and early embryo development, either reflecting developmental switches or substrate availability. The exact role of sperm mitochondria is especially controversial. Mitochondria-generated ROS function in signalling but are mostly described when produced under pathological conditions. Mitochondria-based calcium signalling is primarily important in embryo activation and embryonic stem cell differentiation. Besides pathologically triggered apoptosis, mitochondria participate in apoptotic events related to the regulation of spermatogonial cell number, as well as gamete, embryo and embryonic stem cell quality. Interestingly, data from knock-out (KO) mice is not always straightforward in terms of expected phenotypes. Finally, recent data suggests that mitochondrial activity can modulate embryonic stem cell pluripotency as well as differentiation into distinct cellular fates.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>Mitochondria-based events regulate different aspects of reproductive function, but these are not uniform throughout the several systems reviewed. Low mitochondrial activity seems a feature of &lsquo;stemness&rsquo;, being described in spermatogonia, early embryo, inner cell mass cells and embryonic stem cells.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramalho-Santos, J., Varum, S., Amaral, S., Mota, P. C., Sousa, A. P., Amaral, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: a new target for infertility treatment?]]></title>
<link>http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/dmp004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>BACKGROUND</st>
<p>Adaptation of the maternal immune response to accommodate the semi-allogeneic fetus is necessary for pregnancy success, and disturbances in maternal tolerance are implicated in infertility and reproductive pathologies. T regulatory (Treg) cells are a recently discovered subset of T-lymphocytes with potent suppressive activity and pivotal roles in curtailing destructive immune responses and preventing autoimmune disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>METHODS</st>
<p>A systematic review was undertaken of the published literature on Treg cells in the ovary, testes, uterus and gestational tissues in pregnancy, and their link with infertility, miscarriage and pathologies of pregnancy. An overview of current knowledge on the generation, activation and modes of action of Treg cells in controlling immune responses is provided, and strategies for manipulating regulatory T-cells for potential applications in reproductive medicine are discussed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>RESULTS</st>
<p>Studies in mouse models show that Treg cells are essential for maternal tolerance of the conceptus, and that expansion of the Treg cell pool through antigen-specific and antigen non-specific pathways allows their suppressive actions to be exerted in the critical peri-implantation phase of pregnancy. In women, Treg cells accumulate in the decidua and are elevated in maternal blood from early in the first trimester. Inadequate numbers of Treg cells or their functional deficiency are linked with infertility, miscarriage and pre-eclampsia.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>CONCLUSIONS</st>
<p>The potency and wide-ranging involvement of Treg cells in immune homeostasis and disease pathology indicates the considerable potential of these cells as therapeutic agents, raising the prospect of their utility in novel treatments for reproductive pathologies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guerin, L. R., Prins, J. R., Robertson, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/humupd/dmp004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: a new target for infertility treatment?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>